ReviewJournal of religion and health2015
Religion, health and confidentiality: an exploratory review of the role of chaplains.
Review in Journal of religion and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of empirical treatments focused on mind-body and spiritually grounded complementary practices for moral injury among veterans.Counseling and values · 2024Article
- Australian Patient Preferences for the Introduction of Spirituality into their Healthcare Journey: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of religion and health · 2023Article
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of patient dignity from the perspective of caregivers.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- The Impact of Faith-Based Pastoral Care in Decreasingly Religious Contexts: The Australian Chaplaincy Advantage in Critical Environments.Journal of religion and health · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing Military Personnel Utilizing Chaplains: A Literature Scoping Review.Journal of religion and health · 2022Article
- Systems Approaches to Occupational Vocal Health: Considerations for Community Faith Leaders.Journal of religion and health · 2022Review
- New Zealand Religious Community Responses to COVID-19 While Under Level 4 Lockdown.Journal of religion and health · 2021Article
- Chaplaincy, Spiritual Care and Moral Injury: Considerations Regarding Screening and Treatment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Moral Injury, Spiritual Care and the Role of Chaplains: An Exploratory Scoping Review of Literature and Resources.Journal of religion and health · 2016Article
- Religion, health and confidentiality: an exploratory review of the role of chaplains.Journal of religion and health · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chaplaincy has traditionally been considered a profession highly respectful of confidentiality. Nevertheless, given increasing professional collaboration within health and welfare contexts, plus the requirements of intervention reporting and the ease of technological data sharing, it is possible that confidentiality may be sacrificed for the sake of expediency. This exploratory review considers the literature relating to the role of chaplaincy and confidentiality that suggests a number of principles which should be considered by chaplaincy associations/organizations to ensure appropriate professional practice and the holistic health and well-being of patients/clients. Recommendations are made for the development of specific policies and procedures, confidentiality training programs and further research for developing universal protocols relating to chaplains and their handling of confidential information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25150056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.