Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25150043›Full record

ReviewReproduction (Cambridge, England)2014

Xenografting of testicular tissue pieces: 12 years of an in vivo spermatogenesis system.

Lucía Arregui, Ina Dobrinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Perspectives: Methods for Evaluating Primate Spermatogonial Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. ThroughoutFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucía ArreguiDepartment of BiologyFaculty of Science, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, SpainDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental MedicineFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada lucia.arregui@gmail.es.
Ina DobrinskiDepartment of BiologyFaculty of Science, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, SpainDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental MedicineFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.

Funding

TRANSPLANTATION OF TESTIS STEM CELLS IN LARGE ANIMALSR01RR017359 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOBRINSKI, INA · 2002 to 2011
$3.6M
Transplantation of Testis Stem Cells in Large AnimalsR01OD016575 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY · PI DOBRINSKI, INA · 2013 to 2024
$2.4M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR017359NIH HHS 5 R01 OD016575-13NIH HHS R01 OD016575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spermatogenesis is a dynamic and complex process that involves endocrine and testicular factors. During xenotransplantation of testicular tissue fragments into immunodecifient mice, a functional communication between host brain and donor testis is established. This interaction allows for the progression of spermatogenesis and recovery of fertilisation-competent spermatozoa from a broad range of mammalian species. In the last few years, significant progress has been achieved in testis tissue xenografting that improves our knowledge about the factors determining the success of grafting. The goal of this review is to provide up to date information about the role of factors such as donor age, donor species, testis tissue preservation or type of recipient mouse on the efficiency of this technique. Applications are described and compared with other techniques with similar purposes. Recent work has demonstrated that testicular tissue xenografting is used as a model to study gonadotoxicity of drugs and to obtain sperm from valuable young males.

Indexed as

SpermatogenesisAge FactorsAnimalsGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMice, SCIDRecovery of FunctionSpecies SpecificitySpermatozoaTestisTransplantation, HeterologousTransplantation Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID25150043
PMCPMC4277018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.