ReviewMutagenesis2014
Next-generation sequencing technologies: breaking the sound barrier of human genetics.
Review in Mutagenesis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformative Applications and Innovations in Next-Generation Sequencing Data Analysis.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Bridging the gap: The role of technological advances in shaping gastrointestinal oncological outcomes.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Assessing the Influence of Selected Permeabilization Methods on Lymphocyte Single-Cell Multi-Omics.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strength of evidence underlying the CMS-FDA parallel review of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in the cancer setting.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics of Vibrio toranzoniae strains.Research square · 2024Article
- Immunological and molecular diagnostic techniques in fish health: present and future prospectus.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Microbial Symphony: Navigating the Intricacies of the Human Oral Microbiome and Its Impact on Health.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Current status and perspectives of genetic testing in gastrointestinal cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
- The epidemiological characteristics of liver disease in hospitalized children: a 10-year single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Mainstreaming of genomics in oncology: a nationwide survey of the genomics training needs of UK oncologists.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Endotoxin in Sepsis: Methods for LPS Detection and the Use of Omics Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Two Genetic Mechanisms in Two Siblings with Intellectual Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Psychosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Targeted-Capture Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis Approach of Pediatric Cholestasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automating microsatellite screening and primer design from multi-individual libraries using Micro-Primers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Deciphering the mutation spectrum in south Indian children with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Impact of Intrahost NS5 Nucleotide Variations on Dengue Virus Replication.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Temporal changes in the spinal cord transcriptome after peripheral nerve injury.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Analysis of Single Nucleotide-Mutated Single-Cancer Cells Using the Combined Technologies of Single-Cell Microarray Chips and Peptide Nucleic Acid-DNA Probes.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Adopting solutions for annotation and reporting of next generation sequencing in clinical practice.Practical laboratory medicine · 2020Article
- A Novel Pathogenic Variant of theJournal of pediatric genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Demand for new technologies that deliver fast, inexpensive and accurate genome information has never been greater. This challenge has catalysed the rapid development of advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS). The generation of large volumes of sequence data and the speed of data acquisition are the primary advantages over previous, more standard methods. In 2013, the Food and Drug Administration granted marketing authorisation for the first high-throughput NG sequencer, Illumina's MiSeqDx, which allowed the development and use of a large number of new genome-based tests. Here, we present a review of template preparation, nucleic acid sequencing and imaging, genome assembly and alignment approaches as well as recent advances in current and near-term commercially available NGS instruments. We also outline the broad range of applications for NGS technologies and provide guidelines for platform selection to best address biological questions of interest. DNA sequencing has revolutionised biological and medical research, and is poised to have a similar impact on the practice of medicine. This tool is but one of an increasing arsenal of developing tools that enhance our capabilities to identify, quantify and functionally characterise the components of biological networks that keep us healthy or make us sick. Despite advances in other 'omic' technologies, DNA sequencing and analysis, in many respects, have played the leading role to date. The new technologies provide a bridge between genotype and phenotype, both in man and model organisms, and have revolutionised how risk of developing a complex human disease may be assessed. The generation of large DNA sequence data sets is producing a wealth of medically relevant information on a large number of individuals and populations that will potentially form the basis of truly individualised medical care in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.