Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25149765›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2014

HPV catch-up vaccination of young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elisabeth Couto, Ingvil Sæterdal, Lene Kristine Juvet, Marianne Klemp

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Medical interventions for high-grade vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-Related Challenges in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Vaccines.Applied health economics and health policy · 2022
    Article
  8. Will HPV vaccination prevent cervical cancer?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vulvar cancer: a review for dermatologists.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth Couto
Ingvil Sæterdal
Lene Kristine Juvet
Marianne KlempNorwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services, Health Economic and Drug Unit, St Olavsplass, PO Box 7004, 0130 Oslo, Norway. marianne.klemp@kunnskapssenteret.no.
Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile prophylactic human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination is considered effective in young girls, it is unclear whether a catch-up vaccination of older girls would be beneficial. We, therefore, aimed to examine the potential health impact of a HPV catch-up vaccination of girls who were too old at the time of vaccine introduction, hence aged 16 and older.

methodsWe systematically searched the literature for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of HPV vaccines on overall mortality, cancer mortality and incidence, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and higher (CIN2+), vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) grade 2 and higher lesions (VIN2+ and VaIN2+, respectively) genital warts (condyloma). We considered all lesions and those associated with HPV type(s) included in the vaccines. RCTs reporting on serious adverse events were also eligible. Selected publications were assessed for potential risk of bias, and we ascertained the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analyses were performed, assuming both random and fixed effects, to estimate risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), using intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations.

resultsWe included 46 publications reporting on 13 RCTs. Most of the RCTs had a maximum follow-up period of four years. We identified no RCT reporting on the effect of HPV catch vaccination on overall and cancer related mortality, and on cervical cancer incidence. We found a borderline protective effect of a HPV catch-up vaccination on all CIN2+, with a pooled RR of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62-1.02) for a follow-up period of 4 years. A HPV catch-up vaccination was associated with a reduction in VIN2+ and VaIN2+ lesions, and condyloma. No difference in risk of serious adverse events was seen in vaccinated participants versus unvaccinated women (pooled RR of 0.99 (0.91-1.08)).

conclusionsThis systematic review indicates that a HPV catch-up vaccination could be beneficial, however the long-term effect of such a vaccination, and its effect on cervical cancer incidence and mortality is still unclear.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesAge FactorsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansIncidencePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationWomen's Health ServicesYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25149765
PMCPMC4159543
OpenAlexW2044791821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.