ReviewMedical science monitor basic research2014
Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq.
Review in Medical science monitor basic research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
128 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ageing transcriptome meta-analysis reveals similarities and differences between key mammalian tissues.Aging · 2021Pooled it
- Differences in CXCR4 expression between day 5 and day 6 euploid blastocysts: A predictor of implantation potential in single embryo transfer.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Transformer-based representation learning for robust gene expression modeling and cancer prognosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Profiling lamina specific pyramidal neurons using postmortem human formalin fixed paraffin embedded frontal cortex tissue in combination with digital spatial profiling.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2025Article
- Distilling Direct Effects via Conditional Differential Gene Expression Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A preliminary bioinformatic screen to identify SRI SMC2 PSIP1 TLE4 and MSX1 as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers of osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Frontal cortex pyramidal neuron expression profiles differentiate the prodromal stage from progressive degeneration across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Time-resolved analysis of Bacillus subtilis DB104 Spo0A-mutant transcriptome profile and enhancement of recombinant protein release.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Predicting theLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Circular RNA encoded by PPARG in the peripheral blood and a lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiomyocyte inflammation model is identified as a marker of fulminant myocarditis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Understanding the Molecular Toxicity of Metal-Based Nanoparticles Through Nanotoxicomics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing renal biopsy: the emerging role of omics and artificial intelligence in nephrology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Genomics reveal local skin immune response key to control sarcoptic mange in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica).BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Learning chemical sensitivity reveals mechanisms of cellular response.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Body fluid multiomics in 3PM-guided ischemic stroke management: health risk assessment, targeted protection against health-to-disease transition, and cost-effective personalized approach are envisaged.The EPMA journal · 2024Review
- Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software-metric collection beyond citations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis and Validation of Potential Markers Associated with Prediction and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Evaluation of network-guided random forest for disease gene discovery.BioData mining · 2024Article
68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the control of gene expression is critical for our understanding of the relationship between genotype and phenotype. The need for reliable assessment of transcript abundance in biological samples has driven scientists to develop novel technologies such as DNA microarray and RNA-Seq to meet this demand. This review focuses on comparing the two most useful methods for whole transcriptome gene expression profiling. Microarrays are reliable and more cost effective than RNA-Seq for gene expression profiling in model organisms. RNA-Seq will eventually be used more routinely than microarray, but right now the techniques can be complementary to each other. Microarrays will not become obsolete but might be relegated to only a few uses. RNA-Seq clearly has a bright future in bioinformatic data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.