Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25149517›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Combined use of bacteriophage K and a novel bacteriophage to reduce Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

D R Alves, A Gaudion, J E Bean, P Perez Esteban, T C Arnot, D R Harper, W Kot, L H Hansen, M C Enright, A Tobias A Jenkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Detachable dissolving microneedles loaded withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D R AlvesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
A GaudionDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
J E BeanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
P Perez EstebanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
T C ArnotDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
D R HarperAmpliPhi Biosciences Corp., Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom.
W KotSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
L H HansenSection of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus Universitet, Roskilde, Denmark.
M C EnrightDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
A Tobias A JenkinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom a.t.a.jenkins@bath.ac.uk.
University of Bath · GBAarhus University · DKUniversity of Bedfordshire · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are major causes of impairment of wound healing and patient morbidity. One of the most common and aggressive wound pathogens is Staphylococcus aureus, displaying a large repertoire of virulence factors and commonly reduced susceptibility to antibiotics, such as the spread of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Bacteriophages are obligate parasites of bacteria. They multiply intracellularly and lyse their bacterial host, releasing their progeny. We isolated a novel phage, DRA88, which has a broad host range among S. aureus bacteria. Morphologically, the phage belongs to the Myoviridae family and comprises a large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome of 141,907 bp. DRA88 was mixed with phage K to produce a high-titer mixture that showed strong lytic activity against a wide range of S. aureus isolates, including representatives of the major international MRSA clones and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Its efficacy was assessed both in planktonic cultures and when treating established biofilms produced by three different biofilm-producing S. aureus isolates. A significant reduction of biofilm biomass over 48 h of treatment was recorded in all cases. The phage mixture may form the basis of an effective treatment for infections caused by S. aureus biofilms.

Indexed as

BacteriolysisBiofilmsDNA, ViralHost SpecificityMolecular Sequence DataMyoviridaeSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus PhagesViral LoadDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25149517
PMCPMC4249044
OpenAlexW2052389819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.