Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25149295›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2015

Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens.

F Iafrate, M Iannitti, M Ciolina, P Baldassari, A Pichi, A Laghi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02371655 (Different Bowel Preparations in CT Colonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02371655 nacompletednot on this map

Different Bowel Preparations in CT Colonography: is Diet Necessary? A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Roma La SapienzaRan2015 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsCathartic Colon, Colonic NeoplasmsArmsDiet, Faecal Tagging, Bowel cleansing, CT colonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F IafrateDepartment of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy, francoiafrate@gmail.com.
M Iannitti
M Ciolina
P Baldassari
A Pichi
A Laghi
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare two regimens of reduced bowel preparation and faecal tagging for CT colonography. MATERIALS AND

methodsSingle centre, prospective, randomized, noninferiority study, in which 52 consecutive adults underwent routine CT colonography. Patients, following a three-day low-fibre diet, received one of the two reduced preparations: 1-L polyethylene glycol and four tablets of bisacodyl in association with 90 mL of Iopamidol for faecal tagging administered on the same day as CTC examination (group 1); or a standard "iodine-only" preparation, consisting in 180 ml of Iopamidol the day before the examination (group 2). Primary outcome was the overall quality of bowel preparation.

resultsTwenty-six patients per group were included. Per segment analysis showed preparation of diagnostic quality in 97.4% of segments in group 1 and in 95.5% in group 2 (p = ns). Per-patient analysis showed optimal quality of preparation in 76.9% of patients in group 1 and in 84.6% in group 2 (p = ns). Patient tolerability to both preparations was not different.

conclusionA limited bowel preparation consisting of 1-L PEG and four tablets of bisacodyl in association with 90 mL of Iodine for faecal tagging administered on the same day as CTC examination is feasible and offers bowel cleansing comparable to "iodine-only" preparation. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose PEG bisacodyl and Iopamidol preparation is feasible, providing adequate bowel cleansing. • Faecal tagging is not different from the two limited preparations. • Patient tolerability to the two colon cleansing regimens is similar.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBisacodylCatharticsColonic DiseasesColonography, Computed TomographicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsProspective StudiesBisacodylCatharticsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID25149295
OpenAlexW2027141574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.