Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25149151›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

A generalizable NLP framework for fast development of pattern-based biomedical relation extraction systems.

Yifan Peng, Manabu Torii, Cathy H Wu, K Vijay-Shanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  4. DEXTER: Disease-Expression Relation Extraction from Text.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  5. Extracting chemical-protein relations using attention-based neural networks.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Overview of Biomolecular Event Extraction from Scientific Documents.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifan PengDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA. yfpeng@udel.edu.
Manabu Torii
Cathy H Wu
K Vijay-Shanker

Funding

Linking Text Mining and Data Mining for Biomedical Knowledge DiscoveryG08LM010720 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2010 to 2012
$438k
NLM NIH HHS G08 LM010720NLM NIH HHS G08LM010720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundText mining is increasingly used in the biomedical domain because of its ability to automatically gather information from large amount of scientific articles. One important task in biomedical text mining is relation extraction, which aims to identify designated relations among biological entities reported in literature. A relation extraction system achieving high performance is expensive to develop because of the substantial time and effort required for its design and implementation. Here, we report a novel framework to facilitate the development of a pattern-based biomedical relation extraction system. It has several unique design features: (1) leveraging syntactic variations possible in a language and automatically generating extraction patterns in a systematic manner, (2) applying sentence simplification to improve the coverage of extraction patterns, and (3) identifying referential relations between a syntactic argument of a predicate and the actual target expected in the relation extraction task.

resultsA relation extraction system derived using the proposed framework achieved overall F-scores of 72.66% for the Simple events and 55.57% for the Binding events on the BioNLP-ST 2011 GE test set, comparing favorably with the top performing systems that participated in the BioNLP-ST 2011 GE task. We obtained similar results on the BioNLP-ST 2013 GE test set (80.07% and 60.58%, respectively). We conducted additional experiments on the training and development sets to provide a more detailed analysis of the system and its individual modules. This analysis indicates that without increasing the number of patterns, simplification and referential relation linking play a key role in the effective extraction of biomedical relations.

conclusionsIn this paper, we present a novel framework for fast development of relation extraction systems. The framework requires only a list of triggers as input, and does not need information from an annotated corpus. Thus, we reduce the involvement of domain experts, who would otherwise have to provide manual annotations and help with the design of hand crafted patterns. We demonstrate how our framework is used to develop a system which achieves state-of-the-art performance on a public benchmark corpus.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningLanguagePattern Recognition, AutomatedPublicationsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25149151
PMCPMC4262219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.