ReviewDer Nervenarzt2014
[Contribution of spinal cord biopsy to the differential diagnosis of longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are characterized by recurrent optic neuritis (ON) and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) as well as the serological detection of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-ab). However, longitudinal extensive spinal cord lesions are not pathognomonic for NMOSD as they can also occur in systemic autoimmune diseases or mimic spinal cord tumors. OBJECTIVES/
methodsWe report a female patient who initially presented with a subacute spinal syndrome and a longitudinal spinal cord lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As the brain MRI showed only unspecific white matter lesions and the cerebrospinal fluid was normal, a spinal cord biopsy was performed to exclude malignancies and revealed inflammatory demyelinating changes. In addition, after several deep vein thromboses and the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies, an antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed. Many years after the spinal cord biopsy, AQP4-ab were tested and found to be positive. We discuss the important differential diagnoses of LETM, give an overview of previously reported NMOSD cases in which a spinal cord biopsy was performed and highlight the crucial role of AQP4-ab testing for the differential diagnosis of longitudinal spinal cord lesions. RESULTS/
conclusionsConsidering possible serious sequelae of spinal biopsy procedures, testing for AQP4-ab is mandatory in patients with unclear longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions and should be performed preoperatively in all cases. In light of the heterogeneity of available assays, different detection methods should be used in doubtful cases. The relationship between NMO and APS needs further clarification; however, AQP4 IgG testing is recommended in patients presenting with APS and myelitis, optic neuritis or brainstem encephalitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.