Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25147543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Methane production from protozoan endosymbionts following stimulation of microbial metabolism within subsurface sediments.

Dawn E Holmes, Ludovic Giloteaux, Roberto Orellana, Kenneth H Williams, Mark J Robbins, Derek R Lovley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The effect ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Detrimental impact of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insights into the biotechnology potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Correlation of Key Physiological Properties ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Ruminal Protozoal Populations of Angus Steers Differing in Feed Efficiency.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. The host-associated archaeome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn E HolmesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA ; Physical and Biological Sciences, Western New England University Springfield, MA, USA.
Ludovic GiloteauxDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Roberto OrellanaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Kenneth H WilliamsLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mark J RobbinsLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA, USA.
Derek R LovleyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that protozoa prey on Fe(III)- and sulfate-reducing bacteria that are enriched when acetate is added to uranium contaminated subsurface sediments to stimulate U(VI) reduction. In order to determine whether protozoa continue to impact subsurface biogeochemistry after these acetate amendments have stopped, 18S rRNA and ß-tubulin sequences from this phase of an in situ uranium bioremediation field experiment were analyzed. Sequences most similar to Metopus species predominated, with the majority of sequences most closely related to M. palaeformis, a cilitated protozoan known to harbor methanogenic symbionts. Quantification of mcrA mRNA transcripts in the groundwater suggested that methanogens closely related to Metopus endosymbionts were metabolically active at this time. There was a strong correlation between the number of mcrA transcripts from the putative endosymbiotic methanogen and Metopus ß-tubulin mRNA transcripts during the course of the field experiment, suggesting that the activity of the methanogens was dependent upon the activity of the Metopus species. Addition of the eukaryotic inhibitors cyclohexamide and colchicine to laboratory incubations of acetate-amended subsurface sediments significantly inhibited methane production and there was a direct correlation between methane concentration and Metopus ß-tubulin and putative symbiont mcrA gene copies. These results suggest that, following the stimulation of subsurface microbial growth with acetate, protozoa harboring methanogenic endosymbionts become important members of the microbial community, feeding on moribund biomass and producing methane.

Indexed as

anaerobic protozoaendosymbiontin situ transcriptomicsmethanogenesisuranium bioremediation

Identifiers

PMID25147543
PMCPMC4123621
OpenAlexW2130374652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.