ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
Studying real-world perceptual expertise.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent connections facilitate occluded object recognition by explaining-away.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Visual discrimination training increases the speed stimulus processing and leads to an earlier onset of stimulus encoding.PloS one · 2025Article
- Jack of all trades, master of one: domain-specific and domain-general contributions to perceptual expertise in visual comparison.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
- A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Visual tracking assessment in a soccer-specific virtual environment: A web-based study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Early Visual Processing and Perception Processes in Object Discrimination Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Exemplar learning reveals the representational origins of expert category perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
- Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2019Article
- Article
- Psychological perspectives on expertise.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.Visual cognitionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant insights into visual cognition have come from studying real-world perceptual expertise. Many have previously reviewed empirical findings and theoretical developments from this work. Here we instead provide a brief perspective on approaches, considerations, and challenges to studying real-world perceptual expertise. We discuss factors like choosing to use real-world versus artificial object domains of expertise, selecting a target domain of real-world perceptual expertise, recruiting experts, evaluating their level of expertise, and experimentally testing experts in the lab and online. Throughout our perspective, we highlight expert birding (also called birdwatching) as an example, as it has been used as a target domain for over two decades in the perceptual expertise literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.