Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25147510›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Valenced action/inhibition learning in humans is modulated by a genetic variant linked to dopamine D2 receptor expression.

Anni Richter, Marc Guitart-Masip, Adriana Barman, Catherine Libeau, Gusalija Behnisch, Sophia Czerney, Denny Schanze, Anne Assmann, Marieke Klein, Emrah Düzel and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dorsal striatal dopamine D1 receptor availability predicts an instrumental bias in action learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anni RichterDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Marc Guitart-MasipWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London London, UK ; Ageing Research Centre, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden.
Adriana BarmanDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Catherine LibeauDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Gusalija BehnischDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Sophia CzerneyDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Denny SchanzeInstitute of Human Genetics, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Anne AssmannDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Marieke KleinDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Emrah DüzelInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany ; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London London, UK ; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin ZenkerInstitute of Human Genetics, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Constanze I SeidenbecherDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Björn H SchottDepartment of Neurochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Otto von Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany ; Department of Psychiatry, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany ; Department of Neurology, University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DECenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational salience plays an important role in shaping human behavior, but recent studies demonstrate that human performance is not uniformly improved by motivation. Instead, action has been shown to dominate valence in motivated tasks, and it is particularly difficult for humans to learn the inhibition of an action to obtain a reward, but the neural mechanism behind this behavioral specificity is yet unclear. In all mammals, including humans, the monoamine neurotransmitter dopamine is particularly important in the neural manifestation of appetitively motivated behavior, and the human dopamine system is subject to considerable genetic variability. The well-studied TaqIA restriction fragment length polymorphism (rs1800497) has previously been shown to affect striatal dopamine metabolism. In this study we investigated a potential effect of this genetic variation on motivated action/inhibition learning. Two independent cohorts consisting of 87 and 95 healthy participants, respectively, were tested using the previously described valenced go/no-go learning paradigm in which participants learned the reward-associated no-go condition significantly worse than all other conditions. This effect was modulated by the TaqIA polymorphism, with carriers of the A1 allele showing a diminished learning-related performance enhancement in the rewarded no-go condition compared to the A2 homozygotes. This result highlights a modulatory role for genetic variability of the dopaminergic system in individual learning differences of action-valence interaction.

Indexed as

action biasdopamine D2 receptormotivated learningreward learningTaqIA

Identifiers

PMID25147510
PMCPMC4123722
OpenAlexW2021378141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.