Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25147504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Robust quantification of orientation selectivity and direction selectivity.

Mark Mazurek, Marisa Kager, Stephen D Van Hooser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early Development of Direction Selectivity in the Higher Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark MazurekDepartment of Biology, Metropolitan State University of Denver Denver, CO, USA.
Marisa KagerInSPIRE Program, Concord Academy Concord, MA, USA ; Department of Biology, Brandeis University Waltham, MA, USA.
Stephen D Van HooserDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

Circuit mechanisms underlying experience-dependent developmentR01EY022122 · NEI · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN HOOSER, STEPHEN D · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the visual cortex of all examined mammals exhibit orientation or direction tuning. New imaging techniques are allowing the circuit mechanisms underlying orientation and direction selectivity to be studied with clarity that was not possible a decade ago. However, these new techniques bring new challenges: robust quantitative measurements are needed to evaluate the findings from these studies, which can involve thousands of cells of varying response strength. Here we show that traditional measures of selectivity such as the orientation index (OI) and direction index (DI) are poorly suited for quantitative evaluation of orientation and direction tuning. We explore several alternative methods for quantifying tuning and for addressing a variety of questions that arise in studies on orientation- and direction-tuned cells and cell populations. We provide recommendations for which methods are best suited to which applications and we offer tips for avoiding potential pitfalls in applying these methods. Our goal is to supply a solid quantitative foundation for studies involving orientation and direction tuning.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsChoice BehaviorHumansMonte Carlo MethodNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PathwaysMonte Carloneural data analysissampling

Identifiers

PMID25147504
PMCPMC4123790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.