ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Impact of variance components on reliability of absolute quantification using digital PCR.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Inference from Reported Concentrations in Environmental Surveillance by Modeling the Statistical Features of Digital PCR.ACS ES&T water · 2026Article
- Quantitative Multiplex Digital PCR with Fluorescence-Encoded Nanoreactor Beads.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Droplet Digital CRISPR for Nucleic Acid Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Predicting Polymerase Chain Reaction Success: Integrating theCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Comparing the precision of two digital PCR applications for copy number comparisons in protists.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Digital PCR assays for quantifying trichothecene-producing Fusarium species, including Fusarium langsethiae, F. poae, and F. sporotrichioides, in oats.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Validating digital polymerase chain reaction for 16S rRNA gene amplification from low biomass environmental samples.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Benchmarking digital PCR partition classification methods with empirical and simulated duplex data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Primary Quantitative Reference Standards for Viral Nucleic Acids Should Be Developed Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Instead of Consensus Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Next-Generation Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction: High-Dynamic-Range Single-Molecule DNA Counting via Ultrapartitioning.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Assessing the Variability of Cell-Associated HIV DNA Quantification through a Multicenter Collaborative Study.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Accuracy of real-time PCR and digital PCR for the monitoring of total HIV DNA under prolonged antiretroviral therapy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Subfamily-specific quantification of endogenous mouse L1 retrotransposons by droplet digital PCR.Analytical biochemistry · 2020Article
- Digital PCR as an Emerging Tool for Monitoring of Microbial Biodegradation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Mitigation of the effect of variability in digital PCR assays through use of duplexed reference assays for normalization.BioTechniques · 2018Article
- Evaluating droplet digital PCR for the quantification of human genomic DNA: converting copies per nanoliter to nanograms nuclear DNA per microliter.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Current, Emerging, and Future Applications of Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2018Review
- Digital PCR dynamic range is approaching that of real-time quantitative PCR.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is an increasingly popular technology for detecting and quantifying target nucleic acids. Its advertised strength is high precision absolute quantification without needing reference curves. The standard data analytic approach follows a seemingly straightforward theoretical framework but ignores sources of variation in the data generating process. These stem from both technical and biological factors, where we distinguish features that are 1) hard-wired in the equipment, 2) user-dependent and 3) provided by manufacturers but may be adapted by the user. The impact of the corresponding variance components on the accuracy and precision of target concentration estimators presented in the literature is studied through simulation.
resultsWe reveal how system-specific technical factors influence accuracy as well as precision of concentration estimates. We find that a well-chosen sample dilution level and modifiable settings such as the fluorescence cut-off for target copy detection have a substantial impact on reliability and can be adapted to the sample analysed in ways that matter. User-dependent technical variation, including pipette inaccuracy and specific sources of sample heterogeneity, leads to a steep increase in uncertainty of estimated concentrations. Users can discover this through replicate experiments and derived variance estimation. Finally, the detection performance can be improved by optimizing the fluorescence intensity cut point as suboptimal thresholds reduce the accuracy of concentration estimates considerably.
conclusionsLike any other technology, dPCR is subject to variation induced by natural perturbations, systematic settings as well as user-dependent protocols. Corresponding uncertainty may be controlled with an adapted experimental design. Our findings point to modifiable key sources of uncertainty that form an important starting point for the development of guidelines on dPCR design and data analysis with correct precision bounds. Besides clever choices of sample dilution levels, experiment-specific tuning of machine settings can greatly improve results. Well-chosen data-driven fluorescence intensity thresholds in particular result in major improvements in target presence detection. We call on manufacturers to provide sufficiently detailed output data that allows users to maximize the potential of the method in their setting and obtain high precision and accuracy for their experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.