Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25146956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Tissue-specific mechanical and geometrical control of cell viability and actin cytoskeleton alignment.

Dong Wang, Wenfu Zheng, Yunyan Xie, Peiyuan Gong, Fang Zhao, Bo Yuan, Wanshun Ma, Yan Cui, Wenwen Liu, Yi Sun and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nuclear deformability and telomere dynamics are regulated by cell geometric constraints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dong Wang1] Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China [2] Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100846, China.
Wenfu ZhengBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Yunyan Xie1] Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China [2] Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100846, China.
Peiyuan GongBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Fang ZhaoBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Bo Yuan1] Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China [2] Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100846, China.
Wanshun MaBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Yan CuiBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Wenwen Liu1] Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China [2] Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100846, China.
Yi Sun1] Beijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China [2] Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100846, China.
Matthieu PielBiologie du cycle cellulaire et de la motilité, CNRS, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Wei ZhangBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
Xingyu JiangBeijing Engineering Research Center for BioNanotechnology &CAS Key Lab for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, 11 Beiyitiao, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100190, China.
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology · CNCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different tissues have specific mechanical properties and cells of different geometries, such as elongated muscle cells and polygonal endothelial cells, which are precisely regulated during embryo development. However, the mechanisms that underlie these processes are not clear. Here, we built an in vitro model to mimic the cellular microenvironment of muscle by combining both mechanical stretch and geometrical control. We found that mechanical stretch was a key factor that determined the optimal geometry of myoblast C2C12 cells under stretch, whereas vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts had no such dependency. We presented the first experimental evidence that can explain why myoblasts are destined to take the elongated geometry so as to survive and maintain parallel actin filaments along the stretching direction. The study is not only meaningful for the research on myogenesis but also has potential application in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalActin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell LineCell ShapeHumansMiceProtein StabilitySingle-Cell AnalysisStress, MechanicalActins

Identifiers

PMID25146956
PMCPMC4141254
OpenAlexW1964758465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.