ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2014
Ventricular access device infection rate: a retrospective study and review of the literature.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy of ventriculosubgaleal shunt in managing neonatal hydrocephalus due to intraventricular hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- The significance and utility of ventricular access devices in children with proximal CSF shunt malfunction.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Rates of cerebrospinal fluid infection and the causative organisms following shunt procedures in Saudi Arabia. A retrospective study based on radiological findings.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
- Shunt Devices for Neurointensivists: Complications and Management.Neurocritical care · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVentricular access devices (VAD) are often used for treatment of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) in preterm infants. The reported rates of infection have varied and range from 0 to 22 %. The objective of our study is to present our VAD associated infection at our institution.
methodsThe charts for patients that had VADs inserted between May 1, 2009 and October 31, 2013 at a single institution (Children's Healthcare of Atlanta) were retrospectively reviewed. The number of VAD infections, defined as either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-positive cultures or wound complication, was recorded. Of patients that survived, the number of VAD to shunt conversions was also examined. The data from 15 previously published studies were pooled to determine overall VAD infection and VAD to shunt conversion rates.
resultsA total of 142 VADs were placed. There were 13 infections (9.2 %), 11 of which had CSF-positive cultures (7.7 %). There were two wound complications with negative CSF cultures. Six patients died after VAD placement for reasons unrelated to their VAD surgeries (4.2 %). In the remaining patients, there were 113 VAD to shunt conversions (83.1 %). Fifteen studies that reported VAD infections were analyzed; an overall infection rate of 7.0 % and VAD to shunt conversion rate of 79 % were calculated.
conclusionsWhile VAD is a valuable tool to treat PHH, it remains a procedure with an infection rate between 7.0 and 8.0 %. Close follow-up is needed to capture these adverse events as early as possible. Approximately 80 % of patients with PHH will require permanent CSF diversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25146835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.