Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25146716›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of incisional surgical site infection after Whipple's procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) with preoperatively-placed intrabiliary stents: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Alexsander K Bressan, Derek J Roberts, Janet P Edwards, Sana U Bhatti, Elijah Dixon, Francis R Sutherland, Oliver Bathe, Chad G Ball

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01836237 (The Use of Wound Protectors to Prevent Surgical Site Infection for Whipples), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01836237 nacompletednot on this map

The Use of Wound Protectors to Prevent Surgical Site Infection for Whipples (Pancreatoduodenectomy) With Intrabiliary Stents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2013 to 2016Enrolled107ConditionsSurgical Wound Infection, Pancreatic NeoplasmsArmsAlexis - a wound protector
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN RESECTIONS OF DIGESTIVE SYSTEM TUMOURS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexsander K BressanDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Derek J RobertsDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Calgary, TRW (Teaching, Research, and Wellness), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Janet P EdwardsDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sana U BhattiDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Elijah DixonDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Francis R SutherlandDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Oliver BatheDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chad G BallDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong surgical oncology patients, incisional surgical site infection is associated with substantially increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Moreover, while adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative placement of an intrabiliary stent have a high risk of this type of infection, and wound protectors may significantly reduce its risk, no relevant studies of wound protectors yet exist involving this patient population. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of incisional surgical site infection among adults undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperatively-placed intrabiliary stents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a parallel, dual-arm, randomised controlled trial that will utilise a more explanatory than pragmatic attitude. All adults (≥18 years) undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada with preoperative placement of an intrabiliary stent will be considered eligible. Exclusion criteria will include patient age <18 years and those receiving long-term glucocorticoids. The trial will employ block randomisation to allocate patients to a commercial dual-ring wound protector (the Alexis Wound Protector) or no wound protector and the current standard of care. The main outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infection as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria within 30 days of the index operation date as determined by a research assistant blinded to treatment allocation. Outcomes will be analysed by a statistician blinded to allocation status by calculating risk ratios and 95% CIs and compared using Fisher's exact test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This will be the first randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of incisional surgical site infection among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results of this study are expected to be available in 2016/2017 and will be disseminated using an integrated and end-of-grant knowledge translation strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01836237.

Indexed as

Preoperative CareStentsSurgical InstrumentsHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomySurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID25146716
PMCPMC4156806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.