Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25146715›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Managing patient complaints in China: a qualitative study in Shanghai.

Yishi Jiang, Xiaohua Ying, Qian Zhang, Sirui Rae Tang, Sumit Kane, Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, Xu Qian, HESVIC team authorship

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yishi JiangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China Shanghai Maternal and Child Health Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohua YingSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qian ZhangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sirui Rae TangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sumit KaneKIT Development Policy & Practice, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maitrayee MukhopadhyayKIT Development Policy & Practice, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xu QianSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
HESVIC team authorship
Fudan University · CNRoyal Tropical Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the handling system for patient complaints and to identify existing barriers that are associated with effective management of patient complaints in China.

settingKey stakeholders of the handling system for patient complaints at the national, Shanghai municipal and hospital levels in China.

participants35 key informants including policymakers, hospital managers, healthcare providers, users and other stakeholders in Shanghai. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Semistructured interviews were conducted to understand the process of handling patient complaints and factors affecting the process and outcomes of patient complaint management.

resultsThe Chinese handling system for patient complaints was established in the past decade. Hospitals shoulder the most responsibility of patient complaint handling. Barriers to effective management of patient complaints included service users' low awareness of the systems in the initial stage of the process; poor capacity and skills of healthcare providers, incompetence and powerlessness of complaint handlers and non-transparent exchange of information during the process of complaint handling; conflicts between relevant actors and regulations and unjustifiable complaints by patients during solution settlements; and weak enforcement of regulations, deficient information for managing patient complaints and unwillingness of the hospitals to effectively handle complaints in the postcomplaint stage.

conclusionsBarriers to the effective management of patient complaints vary at the different stages of complaint handling and perspectives on these barriers differ between the service users and providers. Information, procedure design, human resources, system arrangement, unified legal system and regulations and factors shaping the social context all play important roles in effective patient complaint management.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchChinaHospital AdministrationHumansInterviews as TopicState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID25146715
PMCPMC4156808
OpenAlexW2023835591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.