ArticleDer Internist2014
[Incidental bronchoscopic findings].
Article in Der Internist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Haemoptysis : Intensive care management of pulmonary hemorrhage].Der Internist · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflexible and flexible bronchoscopy represents a standard diagnostic procedure in pneumology. Besides lung carcinomas, which is the most frequent indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy, a plethora of clinical symptoms such as chronic persistent cough, hoarseness, unexplained dyspnea, hemoptysis, and suspicious findings on auscultation require further endoscopic evaluation. Moreover, bronchoscopy plays a central role in the diagnostic work-up of interstitial lung diseases and persistent lung infiltrates, in particular those of infectious origin (e.g., fungal, viral, tuberculous, and Pneumocystis jiroveci infections). In addition, diagnostic bronchoscopy has more recently been complemented by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). EBUS is predominantly employed for the accurate diagnosis and mediastinal staging of lung carcinomas, and the assessment of lympadenopathy-associated diseases such as sarcoidosis.Since endoscopic evaluation is typically preceded by computed tomography (CT) of the chest, genuine incidental findings occur relatively seldom and usually account for pathological findings that have been missed on conventional imaging approaches. For instance, characteristic incidental findings include benign and malignant tumors in the area of the endoscopic access and central airways, anatomical variations and (vascular) malformations, tracheal and bronchial airway alterations, and aspirated objects. This review focuses on bronchoscopic findings that have either been completely missed by conventional imaging or differently interpreted due to its radiologic morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.