ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Assessment of health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved health-related quality of life of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with a 2 weeks on and 1 week off schedule of sunitinib.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015Trial
- Patients' self-management of adverse events and patient-reported outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Psychosocial Aspects of Living Long Term with Advanced Cancer and Ongoing Systemic Treatment: A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2022Article
- Comparison of efficacy, safety, and quality of life between sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to comprehensively analyze the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study included 240 Japanese mRCC patients treated with TKIs. We conducted a total of 305 surveys assessing the HRQOL before and 3 months after the introduction of TKIs, including 150, 95 and 60 during treatment with sorafenib, sunitinib and axitinib, respectively, using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form, consisting of eight multi-item scales measuring the health status. There were no significant differences in any of the eight scale scores between these 305 surveys conducted before and 3 months after TKI treatment. Two scores in the surveys during axitinib treatment were significantly superior to those during sorafenib treatment; however, no significant differences were noted in any of the remaining scale scores among the surveys during treatment with the three TKIs. Multivariate analyses, which were performed to evaluate the contribution of several factors to each scale score, revealed that the therapeutic efficacy had independent impacts on two scale scores, despite the lack of an independent association between any scores and the remaining factors, including the age, gender, introduced TKI, timing of TKI introduction and degree of adverse events. Collectively, these findings suggest that treatment with TKIs did not result in a significant impairment of the HRQOL in Japanese patients with mRCC; however, patients with unfavorable disease control appeared to fail to achieve a satisfactory HRQOL during treatment with TKIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25146670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.