Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25146128›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2015

Smoking-specific experiential avoidance cognition: explanatory relevance to pre- and post-cessation nicotine withdrawal, craving, and negative affect.

Samantha G Farris, Michael J Zvolensky, Norman B Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anxiety Sensitivity and Distress Tolerance in Smokers: Relations With Tobacco Dependence, Withdrawal, and Quitting Success†.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  2. A randomized controlled trial of distress tolerance treatment for smoking cessation.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex differences in smoking constructs and abstinence: The explanatory role of smoking outcome expectancies.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha G FarrisUniversity of Houston, Department of Psychology, 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77024, United States.
Michael J ZvolenskyUniversity of Houston, Department of Psychology, 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77024, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Behavioral Science, 1155 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: mjzvolen@central.uh.edu.
Norman B SchmidtFlorida State University, Department of Psychology, 1107 W Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32304, United States.
Florida State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Smoking-Based Prevention Program for Panic DisorderR01MH076629 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FOREHAND, REX · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Panic-Relevant Sensations and Smoking MotivationF31DA035564 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FARRIS, SAMANTHA GWEN · 2013 to 2015
$101k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA035564NIDA NIH HHS F31-DA035564-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076629NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH076629-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative-reinforcement based cognitive processes have been implicated in the maintenance of cigarette smoking. Given the expectation that smoking will attenuate aversive internal experiences, smokers may be particularly unwilling to experience or remain in contact with smoking-related distress (i.e., experiential avoidance). Yet, there is little known about a cognitive-based process termed smoking-specific experiential avoidance with regard to withdrawal, craving, or negative affect during a quit attempt.

methodData were collected from adult daily smokers (n = 259) participating in a larger smoking cessation trial. Pre- and post-quit experiences of nicotine withdrawal, craving, and negative affect were examined in terms of cognitive-based smoking-specific experimental avoidance, measured by the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS).

resultsResults indicated that baseline smoking-specific experiential avoidance was associated with greater overall levels of withdrawal, craving, and negative affect at treatment initiation (pre-cessation). Reductions in smoking-specific experiential avoidance from baseline to quit day were associated with increased likelihood of quit day abstinence. Such reductions were also predictive of lower levels of nicotine withdrawal, craving, and negative affect on quit day. Also, less reduction in experiential avoidance was associated with experiencing greater withdrawal in the early phase of quitting. DISCUSSION: The impact of cognitive-based experiential avoidance pertaining to smoking impacts both pre- and post-cessation experiences in terms of negative affect, withdrawal, and smoking cravings and may represent an important treatment target.

Indexed as

AffectAvoidance LearningCravingAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleReinforcement, PsychologySmokingSmoking CessationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTobacco Use DisorderCognitive flexibilityexperiential avoidanceNegative affectNicotine withdrawalSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID25146128
PMCPMC4320024
OpenAlexW2057491331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.