ArticleJournal of endodontics2014
Capping a pulpotomy with calcium aluminosilicate cement: comparison to mineral trioxide aggregates.
Article in Journal of endodontics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histopathologic responses of the dental pulp to an experimental calcium aluminate-calcium silicate based capping material in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of calcium-enriched mixture and mineral trioxide aggregate in vital pulp therapy of molars: A systematic review.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Physico-chemical analysis of eight pre-mixed hydraulic silicate sealers.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, bioceramic putty and tannic acid in maintaining pulp vitality after experimental pulpotomy in rats.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tissue response and expression of interleukins (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-10 after pulp capping with bioglasses in mice.Brazilian oral research · 2024Article
- Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.International endodontic journal · 2022Review
- Review
- Bioactive tri/dicalcium silicate cements for treatment of pulpal and periapical tissues.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Review
- Histology of NeoMTA Plus and Quick-Set2 in Contact with Pulp and Periradicular Tissues in a Canine Model.Journal of endodontics · 2018Article
- Odontogenic differentiation potential of human dental pulp cells cultured on a calcium-aluminate enriched chitosan-collagen scaffold.Clinical oral investigations · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCalcium aluminate cements have shown little affinity for bacterial growth, low toxicity, and immunogenicity when used as a restoration material, but calcium aluminate cements have not been tested in vivo in pulpotomy procedures.
methodsTo address this question, a calcium aluminosilicate cement (Quick-Set) was tested along with 2 mineral trioxide aggregates, ProRoot MTA and MTA Plus. These cements were used as a capping agent after pulpotomy. Control rats had no pulpotomy, or the pulpotomy was not capped. Proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-1α were measured, and histology was performed at 30 and 60 days after capping. The nociceptive response was determined by measuring the lengthening of the rat's meal duration.
resultsand
conclusionsIL-1β and IL-1α concentrations were reduced in the capped teeth, but no differences were observed among the 3 cements. Dentinal bridging could be detected at both 30 and 60 days with each of the 3 cements, and the pulps were still vital 60 days after capping. Meal duration significantly shortened after placement of the 3 different cements, indicating a nociceptive response, but there were no differences among the materials. Calcium aluminosilicate cement had similar properties to mineral trioxide aggregates and is a viable option for pulpotomy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.