Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25145880›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Male-female communication triggers calcium signatures during fertilization in Arabidopsis.

Philipp Denninger, Andrea Bleckmann, Andreas Lausser, Frank Vogler, Thomas Ott, David W Ehrhardt, Wolf B Frommer, Stefanie Sprunck, Thomas Dresselhaus, Guido Grossmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Calcium signaling in crops.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Transcriptional dynamics during karyogamy in rice zygotes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Distribution of exchangeable CaScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp Denninger1] Cell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany [2] Cell Networks-Cluster of Excellence and Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea BleckmannCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Andreas LausserCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Frank VoglerCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas OttInstitute of Genetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
David W EhrhardtDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Wolf B FrommerDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Stefanie SprunckCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas DresselhausCell Biology and Plant Biochemistry, Biochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Guido Grossmann1] Cell Networks-Cluster of Excellence and Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany [2] Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
University of Regensburg · DEDepartment of Plant Biology · USCarnegie Institution for Science · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-cell communication and interaction is critical during fertilization and triggers free cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+]cyto) as a key signal for egg activation and a polyspermy block in animal oocytes. Fertilization in flowering plants is more complex, involving interaction of a pollen tube with egg adjoining synergid cells, culminating in release of two sperm cells and their fusion with the egg and central cell, respectively. Here, we report the occurrence and role of [Ca2+]cyto signals during the entire double fertilization process in Arabidopsis. [Ca2+]cyto oscillations are initiated in synergid cells after physical contact with the pollen tube apex. In egg and central cells, a short [Ca2+]cyto transient is associated with pollen tube burst and sperm cell arrival. A second extended [Ca2+]cyto transient solely in the egg cell is correlated with successful fertilization. Thus, each female cell type involved in double fertilization displays a characteristic [Ca2+]cyto signature differing by timing and behaviour from [Ca2+]cyto waves reported in mammals.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumCalcium SignalingCell CommunicationGenetic MarkersOvulePlants, Genetically ModifiedPollen TubePromoter Regions, GeneticArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25145880
PMCPMC4143946
OpenAlexW2048420864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.