Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25145507›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Meta-analysis of adjunctive non-NK1 receptor antagonist medications for the control of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Thaiana Aragão Santana, Damila Cristina Trufelli, Leandro Luongo de Matos, Felipe Melo Cruz, Auro Del Giglio

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of cannabinoids for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Endocannabinoid signaling in stress, nausea, and vomiting.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thaiana Aragão SantanaOncology Department, ABC Medical School (FMABC), Av. Principe de Gales, São Paulo, 09060-650, Brazil, thaianaa@yahoo.com.br.
Damila Cristina Trufelli
Leandro Luongo de Matos
Felipe Melo Cruz
Auro Del Giglio
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a distressing chemotherapy-induced symptom that may adversely impact the quality of life of cancer patients.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of the Pubmed, Bireme, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials that were published in English and that evaluated the combination of adjunctive non-neurokinin 1 (NK1) antagonist drugs (i.e., neuroleptics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, and cannabinoids) with 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonists for adult cancer patients who were scheduled to receive moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We employed the Review Manager (RevMan) Computer program Version 5.2 for statistical calculations.

resultsWe included 13 studies with a total of 1,669 patients. We observed a higher complete protection for acute CINV with adjunctive medications (risk ratio (RR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 47%), which was not the case for the delayed period (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.73-1.10, p = 0.29, I2 = 15%). We also observed that these adjunctive medications significantly increased the complete control of nausea (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; p = 0.02, I2 = 83%) and vomiting (RR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.50-0.75; p < 0.00001; I2 = 60%). There was no subgroup analysis evidence of the superiority of any single group of adjunctive medications.

conclusionsWe conclude that adjunctive non-NK1 antagonist medications may be useful for CINV control. Prospective randomized studies incorporating these low-cost medications into new regimens combining 5-HT3 and NK1 antagonists may be warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodiazepinesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansInduction ChemotherapyNauseaNeoplasmsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsOdds RatioQuality of LifeReceptors, Neurokinin-1Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor AntagonistsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodiazepinesNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Neurokinin-1Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25145507
OpenAlexW2051628031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.