Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144909›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2014

The effects of prior authorization policies on medicaid-enrolled children's use of antipsychotic medications: evidence from two mid-Atlantic states.

Bradley D Stein, Emily Leckman-Westin, Edward Okeke, Deborah M Scharf, Mark Sorbero, Qingxian Chen, Ka Ho Brian Chor, Molly Finnerty, Jennifer P Wisdom

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safer and targeted use of antipsychotics in youth: an embedded, pragmatic randomized trial.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Longitudinal Analysis of Concerning Psychotropic Medication Regimens Among Adolescents in Foster Care.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends Over Time in Antipsychotic Initiation at a Large Children's Health Care System.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Dosing and Monitoring: Children and Adolescents.Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing by Physicians to Young Children.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bradley D Stein1 RAND Corporation , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Emily Leckman-Westin
Edward Okeke
Deborah M Scharf
Mark Sorbero
Qingxian Chen
Ka Ho Brian Chor
Molly Finnerty
Jennifer P Wisdom
RAND Corporation · USAmerican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · USGeorge Washington University · USNew York State Office of Mental Health · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH090322 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2011 to 2015
$8.1M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the impact of prior authorization policies on the receipt of antipsychotic medication for Medicaid-enrolled children.

methodsUsing de-identified administrative Medicaid data from two large, neighboring, mid-Atlantic states from November 2007 through June 2011, we identified subjects <18 years of age using antipsychotics, from the broader group of children and adolescents receiving behavioral health services or any psychotropic medication. Prior authorization for antipsychotics was required for children in State A <6 years of age from September 2008, and for children <13 years of age from August 2009. No such prior authorizations existed in State B during that period. Filled prescriptions were identified in the data using national drug codes. Using a triple-difference strategy (using differences among the states, time periods, and differences in antidepressant prescribing rates among states over the same time periods), we examined the effect of the prior authorization policy on the rate at which antipsychotic prescriptions were filled for Medicaid-enrolled children and adolescents.

resultsThe impact of prior authorization policies on antipsychotic medication use varied by age: Among 6-12 year old children, the impact of the prior authorization policy on antipsychotic medication prescribing was a modest but statistically significant decrease of 0.47% after adjusting for other factors; there was no effect of the prior authorization among children 0-5 years.

conclusionsPrior authorization policies had a modest but statistically significant effect on antipsychotic use in 6-12 year old children, but had no impact in younger children. Future research is needed to understand the utilization and clinical effects of prior authorization and other policies and interventions designed to influence antipsychotic use in children.

Indexed as

MedicaidPolicyAdolescentAge FactorsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMaleMid-Atlantic RegionUnited StatesAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25144909
PMCPMC4162428
OpenAlexW2072788088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.