Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144856›Full record

ArticleACS nano2014

Instillation versus inhalation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: exposure-related health effects, clearance, and the role of particle characteristics.

Rona M Silva, Kyle Doudrick, Lisa M Franzi, Christel TeeSy, Donald S Anderson, Zheqiong Wu, Somenath Mitra, Vincent Vu, Gavin Dutrow, James E Evans and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Passage of exogeneous fine particles from the lung into the brain in humans and animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of carbon nanotube-induced pulmonary fibrosis: a physicochemical characteristic perspective.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rona M SilvaCenter for Health and the Environment, University of California , Davis, California 95616, United States.
Kyle Doudrick
Lisa M Franzi
Christel TeeSy
Donald S Anderson
Zheqiong Wu
Somenath Mitra
Vincent Vu
Gavin Dutrow
James E Evans
Paul Westerhoff
Laura S Van Winkle
Otto G Raabe
Kent E Pinkerton
University of California, Davis · USArizona State University · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

Engineered Nanomaterials: Linking Physical and Chemical Properties to BiologyU01ES020127 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PINKERTON, KENT ED · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS 1U01ES020127-01NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES020127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) may cause adverse pulmonary responses due to their nanoscale, fibrous morphology and/or biopersistance. This study tested multiple factors (dose, time, physicochemical characteristics, and administration method) shown to affect MWCNT toxicity with the hypothesis that these factors will influence significantly different responses upon MWCNT exposure. The study is unique in that (1) multiple administration methods were tested using particles from the same stock; (2) bulk MWCNT formulations had few differences (metal content, surface area/functionalization); and (3) MWCNT retention was quantified using a specialized approach for measuring unlabeled MWCNTs in rodent lungs. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to original (O), purified (P), and carboxylic acid functionalized (F) MWCNTs via intratracheal instillation and inhalation. Blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and lung tissues were collected at postexposure days 1 and 21 for quantifying biological responses and MWCNTs in lung tissues by programmed thermal analysis. At day 1, MWCNT instillation produced significant BALF neutrophilia and MWCNT-positive macrophages. Instilled O- and P-MWCNTs produced significant inflammation in lung tissues, which resolved by day 21 despite MWCNT retention. MWCNT inhalation produced no BALF neutrophilia and no significant histopathology past day 1. However, on days 1 and 21 postinhalation of nebulized MWCNTs, significantly increased numbers of MWCNT-positive macrophages were observed in BALF. Results suggest (1) MWCNTs produce transient inflammation if any despite persistence in the lungs; (2) instilled O-MWCNTs cause more inflammation than P- or F-MWCNTs; and (3) MWCNT suspension media produce strikingly different effects on physicochemical particle characteristics and pulmonary responses.

Indexed as

HealthToxicity TestsAdministration, InhalationAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCarboxylic AcidsCell DifferentiationChemical PhenomenaDose-Response Relationship, DrugInstillation, DrugMacrophagesMaleNanotubes, CarbonNeutrophilsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCarboxylic AcidsNanotubes, CarbonWaterengineered nanomaterialinflammationinhalation exposuremultiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)pulmonary toxicity

Identifiers

PMID25144856
PMCPMC4174094
OpenAlexW2040213391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.