ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014
Ex-ante benefit-cost analysis of the elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population in the Niayes of Senegal.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Past and Ongoing Tsetse and Animal Trypanosomiasis Control Operations in Five African Countries: A Systematic Review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Pooled it
- Efficacy of high doses of ivermectin-clorsulon in cattle on Glossina palpalis gambiensis survival and fecundity: implications for human and animal trypanosomoses control.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Epidemiological investigation of trypanosomosis in livestock and distribution of vector in Dabo Hana district, Southwest Oromia, Ethiopia.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2024Article
- Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and tsetse fly density in the Yem special district: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and Economic Cost of Trypanosomosis Among SmallHolder Cattle Herders in Arba Minch and Zuria Districts, Gamo Zone, Ethiopia.Environmental health insights · 2024Article
- Animal trypanosomosis eliminated in a major livestock production region in Senegal following the eradication of a tsetse population.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2024Article
- Article
- Near-infrared imaging for automated tsetse pupae sex sorting in support of the sterile insect technique.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2023Article
- The COMBAT project: controlling and progressively minimizing the burden of vector-borne animal trypanosomosis in Africa.Open research Europe · 2022Article
- The cost of tsetse control using 'Tiny Targets' in the sleeping sickness endemic forest area of Bonon in Côte d'Ivoire: Implications for comparing costs across different settings.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Epidemiological investigation of bovine trypanosomosis and distribution of vectors in Jimma zone, Ethiopia.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2021Article
- Review
- Delivering 'tiny targets' in a remote region of southern Chad: a cost analysis of tsetse control in the Mandoul sleeping sickness focus.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Environmental impact of tsetse eradication in Senegal.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Integrated cost-benefit analysis of tsetse control and herd productivity to inform control programs for animal African trypanosomiasis.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Advocacy for identifying certain animal diseases as "neglected".PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Identification of a Tsal152-75 salivary synthetic peptide to monitor cattle exposure to tsetse flies.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Mapping landscape friction to locate isolated tsetse populations that are candidates for elimination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Quality of Sterile Male Tsetse after Long Distance Transport as Chilled, Irradiated Pupae.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2005, the Government of Senegal embarked on a campaign to eliminate a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population from the Niayes area (∼ 1000 km(2)) under the umbrella of the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC). The project was considered an ecologically sound approach to intensify cattle production. The elimination strategy includes a suppression phase using insecticide impregnated targets and cattle, and an elimination phase using the sterile insect technique, necessary to eliminate tsetse in this area. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThree main cattle farming systems were identified: a traditional system using trypanotolerant cattle and two "improved" systems using more productive cattle breeds focusing on milk and meat production. In improved farming systems herd size was 45% lower and annual cattle sales were €250 (s.d. 513) per head as compared to €74 (s.d. 38) per head in traditional farming systems (p<10-3). Tsetse distribution significantly impacted the occurrence of these farming systems (p = 0.001), with 34% (s.d. 4%) and 6% (s.d. 4%) of improved systems in the tsetse-free and tsetse-infested areas, respectively. We calculated the potential increases of cattle sales as a result of tsetse elimination considering two scenarios, i.e. a conservative scenario with a 2% annual replacement rate from traditional to improved systems after elimination, and a more realistic scenario with an increased replacement rate of 10% five years after elimination. The final annual increase of cattle sales was estimated at ∼ €2800/km(2) for a total cost of the elimination campaign reaching ∼ €6400/km(2). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite its high cost, the benefit-cost analysis indicated that the project was highly cost-effective, with Internal Rates of Return (IRR) of 9.8% and 19.1% and payback periods of 18 and 13 years for the two scenarios, respectively. In addition to an increase in farmers' income, the benefits of tsetse elimination include a reduction of grazing pressure on the ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.