Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144730›Full record

ReviewPhysics in medicine and biology2014

An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

X George Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

X George XuRensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York, USA.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

GPU-Based Monte Carlo Software for Computing CT Imaging DosesR01EB015478 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI XU, XIE GEORGE · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
Virtual Patients for Computing Radiation DosesR01CA116743 · NCI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI XU, XIE GEORGE · 2005 to 2007
$2.0M
4D Visible Human Modeling for Radiation DosimetryR01LM009362 · NLM · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI XU, XIE GEORGE · 2007 to 2010
$2.0M
VirtualDose Software for Diagnostic CT Doses to Adults and ChildrenR42EB010404 · NIBIB · VIRTUAL PHANTOMS, INC. · PI XU, XIE GEORGE · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Realistic Phantom Series for OLINDA/EXM Version 2R42CA115122 · NCI · RADAR, INC. · PI STABIN, MICHAEL G · 2005 to 2007
$804k
Use of Visible Human Data For Patient DosimetryR03LM007964 · NLM · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI XU, XIE GEORGE · 2003 to 2004
$218k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116743NCI NIH HHS R01CA116743NCI NIH HHS R42 CA115122NCI NIH HHS R42CA115122NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015478NIBIB NIH HHS R42 EB010404NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009362NLM NIH HHS R01LM009362NLM NIH HHS R01LM009362-03S1NLM NIH HHS R03 LM007964NLM NIH HHS R03LM007964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation dose calculation using models of the human anatomy has been a subject of great interest to radiation protection, medical imaging, and radiotherapy. However, early pioneers of this field did not foresee the exponential growth of research activity as observed today. This review article walks the reader through the history of the research and development in this field of study which started some 50 years ago. This review identifies a clear progression of computational phantom complexity which can be denoted by three distinct generations. The first generation of stylized phantoms, representing a grouping of less than dozen models, was initially developed in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to calculate internal doses from nuclear medicine procedures. Despite their anatomical simplicity, these computational phantoms were the best tools available at the time for internal/external dosimetry, image evaluation, and treatment dose evaluations. A second generation of a large number of voxelized phantoms arose rapidly in the late 1980s as a result of the increased availability of tomographic medical imaging and computers. Surprisingly, the last decade saw the emergence of the third generation of phantoms which are based on advanced geometries called boundary representation (BREP) in the form of Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) or polygonal meshes. This new class of phantoms now consists of over 287 models including those used for non-ionizing radiation applications. This review article aims to provide the reader with a general understanding of how the field of computational phantoms came about and the technical challenges it faced at different times. This goal is achieved by defining basic geometry modeling techniques and by analyzing selected phantoms in terms of geometrical features and dosimetric problems to be solved. The rich historical information is summarized in four tables that are aided by highlights in the text on how some of the most well-known phantoms were developed and used in practice. Some of the information covered in this review has not been previously reported, for example, the CAM and CAF phantoms developed in 1970s for space radiation applications. The author also clarifies confusion about 'population-average' prospective dosimetry needed for radiological protection under the current ICRP radiation protection system and 'individualized' retrospective dosimetry often performed for medical physics studies. To illustrate the impact of computational phantoms, a section of this article is devoted to examples from the author's own research group. Finally the author explains an unexpected finding during the course of preparing for this article that the phantoms from the past 50 years followed a pattern of exponential growth. The review ends on a brief discussion of future research needs (a supplementary file '3DPhantoms.pdf' to figure 15 is available for download that will allow a reader to interactively visualize the phantoms in 3D).

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPhantoms, ImagingRadiation ProtectionDiagnostic ImagingHumansRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID25144730
PMCPMC4169876
OpenAlexW2015421863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.