ReviewPhysics in medicine and biology2014
An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.
Review in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Pooled it
- A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Inter-software variability in CT organ-dose calculation under identical scan conditions: implications for users and dose evaluation in the Japanese population.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Estimation of Detailed Cardiac Doses for Pediatric Radiation Therapy Patients in National Wilms Tumor Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- The UF/MSK adult mesh-based computational human phantom library: applications to organ dosimetry in computed tomography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Fetal dose in pregnant CT patients: a comparison of four software packages.European radiology · 2025Article
- Development of anatomically variable digital Wistar rat phantoms for small animal imaging research.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Transforming body composition of computational phantoms based on form-finding dynamics.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Skeletal surveys for suspected infant abuse: patient-specific radiation dose estimation using a hybrid computational phantom.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Article
- A Historical Survey of Key Epidemiological Studies of Ionizing Radiation Exposure.Radiation research · 2024Review
- Reconstruction of organ doses for patients undergoing computed tomography examinations in Canada 1992-2019.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2024Article
- Creating patient-specific digital phantoms with a longitudinal atlas for evaluating deformable CT-CBCT registration in adaptive lung radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the low-cost pregnant female physical phantom for fetal dosimetry in MV photon radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Changing streetlighting schemes and the ecological availability of darkness.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Synthetic data in radiological imaging: current state and future outlook.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- A novel reconstruction method combining multi-detector SPECT with an elliptical orbit and computer tomography for cardiac imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- In silico simulation of hepatic arteries: An open-source algorithm for efficient synthetic data generation.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Mesh modeling of system geometry and anatomy phantoms for realistic GATE simulations and their inclusion in SPECT reconstruction.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Quantifying and communicating radiation dose and risk from imaging procedures.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2023Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation dose calculation using models of the human anatomy has been a subject of great interest to radiation protection, medical imaging, and radiotherapy. However, early pioneers of this field did not foresee the exponential growth of research activity as observed today. This review article walks the reader through the history of the research and development in this field of study which started some 50 years ago. This review identifies a clear progression of computational phantom complexity which can be denoted by three distinct generations. The first generation of stylized phantoms, representing a grouping of less than dozen models, was initially developed in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to calculate internal doses from nuclear medicine procedures. Despite their anatomical simplicity, these computational phantoms were the best tools available at the time for internal/external dosimetry, image evaluation, and treatment dose evaluations. A second generation of a large number of voxelized phantoms arose rapidly in the late 1980s as a result of the increased availability of tomographic medical imaging and computers. Surprisingly, the last decade saw the emergence of the third generation of phantoms which are based on advanced geometries called boundary representation (BREP) in the form of Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) or polygonal meshes. This new class of phantoms now consists of over 287 models including those used for non-ionizing radiation applications. This review article aims to provide the reader with a general understanding of how the field of computational phantoms came about and the technical challenges it faced at different times. This goal is achieved by defining basic geometry modeling techniques and by analyzing selected phantoms in terms of geometrical features and dosimetric problems to be solved. The rich historical information is summarized in four tables that are aided by highlights in the text on how some of the most well-known phantoms were developed and used in practice. Some of the information covered in this review has not been previously reported, for example, the CAM and CAF phantoms developed in 1970s for space radiation applications. The author also clarifies confusion about 'population-average' prospective dosimetry needed for radiological protection under the current ICRP radiation protection system and 'individualized' retrospective dosimetry often performed for medical physics studies. To illustrate the impact of computational phantoms, a section of this article is devoted to examples from the author's own research group. Finally the author explains an unexpected finding during the course of preparing for this article that the phantoms from the past 50 years followed a pattern of exponential growth. The review ends on a brief discussion of future research needs (a supplementary file '3DPhantoms.pdf' to figure 15 is available for download that will allow a reader to interactively visualize the phantoms in 3D).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.