Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144713›Full record

SynthesisChest2014

System-level planning, coordination, and communication: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

Jeffrey R Dichter, Robert K Kanter, David Dries, Valerie Luyckx, Matthew L Lim, John Wilgis, Michael R Anderson, Babak Sarani, Nathaniel Hupert, Ryan Mutter and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Military Soft Skills Applicable to the ICU.Critical care explorations · 2023
    Article
  9. Implementation of a Virtual Huddle to Support Patient Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Considerations for acute care staffing during a pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pediatric urological surgery readiness condition (PedsUROCON).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  19. Caring for Critically Ill Adults in PICUs Is Not "Child's Play".Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey R Dichter
Robert K Kanter
David Dries
Valerie Luyckx
Matthew L Lim
John Wilgis
Michael R Anderson
Babak Sarani
Nathaniel Hupert
Ryan Mutter
Asha V Devereaux
Michael D Christian
Niranjan Kissoon
Task Force for Mass Critical Care
Task Force for Mass Critical Care
Aurora Health Care · USCase Western Reserve University · USFlorida Hospital Association · USGeorge Washington University · USHealthPartners · USMount Sinai Hospital · CANewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USOffice of International Affairs · USQuality Research · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

OPHPR CDC HHS 1U90TP00591-01OPHPR CDC HHS U90 TP000591PHS HHS 1-HFPEP070013-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystem-level planning involves uniting hospitals and health systems, local/regional government agencies, emergency medical services, and other health-care entities involved in coordinating and enabling care in a major disaster. We reviewed the literature and sought expert opinions concerning system-level planning and engagement for mass critical care due to disasters or pandemics and offer suggestions for system-planning, coordination, communication, and response. The suggestions in this chapter are important for all of those involved in a pandemic or disaster with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials.

methodsThe American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) consensus statement development process was followed in developing suggestions. Task Force members met in person to develop nine key questions believed to be most relevant for system-planning, coordination, and communication. A systematic literature review was then performed for relevant articles and documents, reports, and other publications reported since 1993. No studies of sufficient quality were identified upon which to make evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process.

resultsSuggestions were developed and grouped according to the following thematic elements: (1) national government support of health-care coalitions/regional health authorities (HC/RHAs), (2) teamwork within HC/RHAs, (3) system-level communication, (4) system-level surge capacity and capability, (5) pediatric patients and special populations, (6) HC/RHAs and networks, (7) models of advanced regional care systems, and (8) the use of simulation for preparedness and planning.

conclusionsSystem-level planning is essential to provide care for large numbers of critically ill patients because of disaster or pandemic. It also entails a departure from the routine, independent system and involves all levels from health-care institutions to regional health authorities. National government support is critical, as are robust communication systems and advanced planning supported by realistic exercises.

Indexed as

ConsensusDisastersPandemicsCritical CareCritical IllnessEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Planning OrganizationsHumansWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25144713
PMCPMC4504248
OpenAlexW2149268333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.