ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Ten simple rules of live tweeting at scientific conferences.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Review
- Social Media for Research Discourse, Dissemination, and Collaboration in Rheumatology.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2022Article
- How to use Twitter at a Scientific Conference.mSphere · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for creating reusable pathway models for computational analysis and visualization.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A Social Media Campaign (#datasaveslives) to Promote the Benefits of Using Health Data for Research Purposes: Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Use of Social Media at Cardiovascular Congresses: Opportunities for Education and Dissemination.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Article
- Online conferences for better learning.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Teaching an old pain medicine society new tweets: integrating social media into continuing medical education.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2019Article
- Potential Role of Twitter at an Annual Congress in Japan - Narrative Literature Review of "Tweet the Meeting".Circulation reports · 2019Review
- Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network.PloS one · 2019Article
- Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Rare Cancers and Social Media: Analysis of Twitter Metrics in the First 2 Years of a Rare-Disease Community for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms on Social Media-#MPNSM.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
- Using Social Media at National Meetings in Hematology-Optimal Use, Tips, Strategies, and Limitations.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
- The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquette.Seminars in hematology · 2017Review
- How Social Media is Changing the Practice of Regional Anesthesiology.Current anesthesiology reports · 2017Article
- The new alchemy: Online networking, data sharing and research activity distribution tools for scientists.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Ten Simple Rules for Curating and Facilitating Small Workshops.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.