SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Advanced training in trauma life support for ambulance crews.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prehospital Care Post-Road-Crash: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Global challenges and perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Mobile triage units for abdominal trauma in sub-Saharan Africa: current evidence, implementation barriers, and strategies for scale-up.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Impact of advanced trauma life support training on 30-day mortality in severely injured patients at a Kenyan tertiary center: a retrospective matched case-control study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Italy's Post-COVID-19 Stroke Network: Has It Returned to Pre-Pandemic Standards?Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Current and Future Medical Staff Knowledge on the Course of Trauma Patient Management.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Challenges to the development of the trauma system in Egypt.Journal of public health in Africa · 2023Article
- The effect ofArchives of medical science : AMS · 2022Review
- The Effect ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- [Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest following trauma].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016Article
- Commentary on: "Bullet Fragment of the Lumbar Spine: The Decision Is More Important Than the Incision".Global spine journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is an increasing global burden of injury especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this, models of trauma care initially developed in high income countries are being adopted in LMIC settings. In particular, ambulance crews with advanced life support (ALS) training are being promoted in LMICs as a strategy for improving outcomes for victims of trauma. However, there is controversy as to the effectiveness of this health service intervention and the evidence has yet to be rigorously appraised.
objectivesTo quantify the impact of ALS-trained ambulance crews versus crews without ALS training on reducing mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. SEARCH
methodsThe search for studies was run on the 16th May 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (Ovid), ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S & CPSI-SSH), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), PubMed and screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials and non-randomised studies, including before-and-after studies and interrupted time series studies, comparing the impact of ALS-trained ambulance crews versus crews without ALS training on the reduction of mortality and morbidity in trauma patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed study reports against the inclusion criteria, and extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe found one controlled before-and-after trial, one uncontrolled before-and-after study, and one randomised controlled trial that met the inclusion criteria. None demonstrated evidence to support ALS training for pre-hospital personnel. In the uncontrolled before-and-after study, 'a priori' sub-group analysis showed an increase in mortality among patients who had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than nine and received care from ALS trained ambulance crews. Additionally, when the pre-hospital trauma score was taken into account in logistic regression analysis, mortality in the patients receiving care from ALS trained crews increased significantly. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAt this time, the evidence indicates that there is no benefit of advanced life support training for ambulance crews on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.