ArticlePloS one2014
Choice of reference sequence and assembler for alignment of Listeria monocytogenes short-read sequence data greatly influences rates of error in SNP analyses.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Probing Genomic Diversity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the genetic basis of heterosis in eucalypt growth based on transcriptome analysis.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- From Farm to Fork: Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens in Livestock Production and the Food Chain.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Constraints in temperature adaptation reinforce differences in thermal niche between mesophilic and psychrotolerantProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Seamless, rapid, and accurate analyses of outbreak genomic data using splitGenome research · 2024Article
- Molecular typing methods to characterizeVeterinary world · 2024Review
- Genome-wide association mapping in a sweet cherry germplasm collection (Horticulture research · 2023Article
- Article
- Restriction Endonuclease-Based Modification-Dependent Enrichment (REMoDE) of DNA for Metagenomic Sequencing.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Adaptation to simulated microgravity in Streptococcus mutans.NPJ microgravity · 2022Article
- Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Welikade: guideline for phylogenetic analysis of serovars rarely involved in foodborne outbreaks.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Phage Annotation Guide: Guidelines for Assembly and High-Quality Annotation.PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Whole Genome Sequence Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Genetic consequences of long-term small effective population size in the critically endangered pygmy hog.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Article
- One is not enough: On the effects of reference genome for the mapping and subsequent analyses of short-reads.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Read trimming has minimal effect on bacterial SNP-calling accuracy.Microbial genomics · 2020Article
- A Vibrio cholerae Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme To Facilitate the Epidemiological Study of Cholera.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Cereulide Synthetase Acquisition and Loss Events within the Evolutionary History of Group IIImBio · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wide availability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and an abundance of open-source software have made detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in bacterial genomes an increasingly accessible and effective tool for comparative analyses. Thus, ensuring that real nucleotide differences between genomes (i.e., true SNPs) are detected at high rates and that the influences of errors (such as false positive SNPs, ambiguously called sites, and gaps) are mitigated is of utmost importance. The choices researchers make regarding the generation and analysis of WGS data can greatly influence the accuracy of short-read sequence alignments and, therefore, the efficacy of such experiments. We studied the effects of some of these choices, including: i) depth of sequencing coverage, ii) choice of reference-guided short-read sequence assembler, iii) choice of reference genome, and iv) whether to perform read-quality filtering and trimming, on our ability to detect true SNPs and on the frequencies of errors. We performed benchmarking experiments, during which we assembled simulated and real Listeria monocytogenes strain 08-5578 short-read sequence datasets of varying quality with four commonly used assemblers (BWA, MOSAIK, Novoalign, and SMALT), using reference genomes of varying genetic distances, and with or without read pre-processing (i.e., quality filtering and trimming). We found that assemblies of at least 50-fold coverage provided the most accurate results. In addition, MOSAIK yielded the fewest errors when reads were aligned to a nearly identical reference genome, while using SMALT to align reads against a reference sequence that is ∼0.82% distant from 08-5578 at the nucleotide level resulted in the detection of the greatest numbers of true SNPs and the fewest errors. Finally, we show that whether read pre-processing improves SNP detection depends upon the choice of reference sequence and assembler. In total, this study demonstrates that researchers should test a variety of conditions to achieve optimal results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.