ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Specificity and affinity quantification of flexible recognition from underlying energy landscape topography.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacological Evaluation of active compounds in papaya associated with thrombocytopenia inhibition in dengue patients through in silico approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Physics-Based Protein Design Methods for Predicting Single Residue Effects on Peptide Binding Specificities.Journal of computational chemistry · 2025Article
- Flexibility-Induced Collective Behavior Drives Symmetry Breaking in Discrimination of Undesired Ions.JACS Au · 2025Article
- Allosteric regulation in STAT3 interdomains is mediated by a rigid core: SH2 domain regulation by CCD in D170A variant.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Perspectives on the landscape and flux theory for describing emergent behaviors of the biological systems.Journal of biological physics · 2022Review
- Molecular Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Binding Mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- De novo synthesized polyunsaturated fatty acids operate as both host immunomodulators and nutrients foreLife · 2021Article
- AMolecular and cellular biology · 2020Article
- Structure, stability and specificity of the binding of ssDNA and ssRNA with proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Position-, disorder-, and salt-dependent diffusion in binding-coupled-folding of intrinsically disordered proteins.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2019Article
- DIBS: a repository of disordered binding sites mediating interactions with ordered proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Electrostatic forces govern the binding mechanism of intrinsically disordered histone chaperones.PloS one · 2017Article
- Protein Ensembles: How Does Nature Harness Thermodynamic Fluctuations for Life? The Diverse Functional Roles of Conformational Ensembles in the Cell.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Understanding the roles of intrinsic disorder in subunits of hemoglobin and the disease process of sickle cell anemia.Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2016Article
- Lessons in Protein Design from Combined Evolution and Conformational Dynamics.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- The universal statistical distributions of the affinity, equilibrium constants, kinetics and specificity in biomolecular recognition.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Common protein sequence signatures associate with Sclerotinia borealis lifestyle and secretion in fungal pathogens of the Sclerotiniaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexibility in biomolecular recognition is essential and critical for many cellular activities. Flexible recognition often leads to moderate affinity but high specificity, in contradiction with the conventional wisdom that high affinity and high specificity are coupled. Furthermore, quantitative understanding of the role of flexibility in biomolecular recognition is still challenging. Here, we meet the challenge by quantifying the intrinsic biomolecular recognition energy landscapes with and without flexibility through the underlying density of states. We quantified the thermodynamic intrinsic specificity by the topography of the intrinsic binding energy landscape and the kinetic specificity by association rate. We found that the thermodynamic and kinetic specificity are strongly correlated. Furthermore, we found that flexibility decreases binding affinity on one hand, but increases binding specificity on the other hand, and the decreasing or increasing proportion of affinity and specificity are strongly correlated with the degree of flexibility. This shows more (less) flexibility leads to weaker (stronger) coupling between affinity and specificity. Our work provides a theoretical foundation and quantitative explanation of the previous qualitative studies on the relationship among flexibility, affinity and specificity. In addition, we found that the folding energy landscapes are more funneled with binding, indicating that binding helps folding during the recognition. Finally, we demonstrated that the whole binding-folding energy landscapes can be integrated by the rigid binding and isolated folding energy landscapes under weak flexibility. Our results provide a novel way to quantify the affinity and specificity in flexible biomolecular recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.