Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144509›Full record

ReviewChest2014

Evacuation of the ICU: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

Mary A King, Alexander S Niven, William Beninati, Ray Fang, Sharon Einav, Lewis Rubinson, Niranjan Kissoon, Asha V Devereaux, Michael D Christian, Colin K Grissom and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of a prioritization score on the inter-hospital transfer time management of severe COVID-19 patients: a quasi-experimental intervention study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Living in a Multi-Risk Chaotic Condition: Pandemic, Natural Hazards and Complex Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The outside medical evacuation for cancer from Madagascar.The Pan African medical journal · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary A King
Alexander S Niven
William Beninati
Ray Fang
Sharon Einav
Lewis Rubinson
Niranjan Kissoon
Asha V Devereaux
Michael D Christian
Colin K Grissom
Task Force for Mass Critical Care
Task Force for Mass Critical Care
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USHarborview Medical Center · USIntermountain Medical Center · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAShaare Zedek Medical Center · ILSunny Hill Health Centre for Children · CAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

OPHPR CDC HHS 1U90TP00591-01OPHPR CDC HHS U90 TP000591PHS HHS 1-HFPEP070013-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high risk for patient harm during unanticipated ICU evacuations, critical care providers receive little to no training on how to perform safe and effective ICU evacuations. We reviewed the pertinent published literature and offer suggestions for the critical care provider regarding ICU evacuation. The suggestions in this article are important for all who are involved in pandemics or disasters with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials.

methodsThe Evacuation and Mobilization topic panel used the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guidelines Oversight Committee's methodology to develop seven key questions for which specific literature searches were conducted to identify studies upon which evidence-based recommendations could be made. No studies of sufficient quality were identified. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process.

resultsBased on current best evidence, we provide 13 suggestions outlining a systematic approach to prepare for and execute an effective ICU evacuation during a disaster. Interhospital and intrahospital collaboration and functional ICU communication are critical for success. Pre-event planning and preparation are required for a no-notice evacuation. A Critical Care Team Leader must be designated within the Hospital Incident Command System. A three-stage ICU Evacuation Timeline, including (1) no immediate threat, (2) evacuation threat, and (3) evacuation implementation, should be used. Detailed suggestions on ICU evacuation, including regional planning, evacuation drills, patient transport preparation and equipment, patient prioritization and distribution for evacuation, patient information and tracking, and federal and international evacuation assistance systems, are also provided.

conclusionsSuccessful ICU evacuation during a disaster requires active preparation, participation, communication, and leadership by critical care providers. Critical care providers have a professional obligation to become better educated, prepared, and engaged with the processes of ICU evacuation to provide a safe continuum of critical care during a disaster.

Indexed as

ConsensusDisastersPandemicsCritical IllnessEmergency ShelterHumansIntensive Care UnitsWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25144509
PMCPMC4504249
OpenAlexW2102126977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.