Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144505›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurosurgical anesthesiology2014

Postoperative cognitive function following general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review.

Nicholas Davis, Melissa Lee, Albert Y Lin, Lisa Lynch, Matthew Monteleone, Louise Falzon, Nighat Ispahany, Susan Lei

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04125121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Neuroplasticity Induced by General Anaesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorSigne Sloth MadsenRan2019 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, General Anaesthesia, NeuroplasticityArmsSevoflurane-propofol
NCT06963229 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cognitive Changes After Hip Prosthesis; Comparison Between Combined Lumbosacral Nerve Block Versus Spinal Anesthesia: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakassed General HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsPostoperative Cognitive ComplicationsArmsSpinal Anesthesia (bupivacaine), Peripheral Nerve Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Postoperative delirium after major orthopedic surgery.World journal of orthopedics · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cognitive function after surgery with regional or general anesthesia: A population-based study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas Davis*Department of Anesthesiology †Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health ‡Augustus C. Long Health Sciences Library, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Melissa Lee
Albert Y Lin
Lisa Lynch
Matthew Monteleone
Louise Falzon
Nighat Ispahany
Susan Lei

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH E · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
Depression, Biobehavioral Mechanisms, & CHD/Mortality OutcomesP01HL088117 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2008 to 2013
$12.5M
Midcareer Mentoring in Behavioral Cardiology: Depression & Cardiovascular DiseaseK24HL084034 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2006 to 2015
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL088117NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL084034NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL088117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes remains in question. This systematic review compares the role of regional versus general anesthesia, with a particular focus on postoperative cognitive function. Potentially relevant articles were identified by searching publicly available computerized databases for this systematic review. Any surgical procedure was accepted with the exception of cardiac, carotid, and neurosurgical procedures. Any regional anesthetic technique was accepted unless combined with a general anesthetic or in conjunction with propofol as a sedative. Any measure of postoperative cognitive function was accepted as long as it was performed no sooner than 7 days postoperatively. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Three studies showed some difference in cognitive function between regional and general anesthesia, whereas the remaining 13 showed no difference between regional and general anesthesia on postoperative cognitive function.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralChildCognitionCognition DisordersHumansPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID25144505
PMCPMC4156882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.