Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144428›Full record

SynthesisBMJ clinical evidence2014

Acute cholecystitis.

Valerie Halpin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ clinical evidence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05712733 (Cholecystitis From a Microbiological and Histopathological Perspective), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05712733 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Cholecystitis From a Microbiological and Histopathological Perspective

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOrgankirurgisk afdeling, sygehus lillebælt, KoldingRan2023 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCalculous Cholecystitis, Antibiotic Resistant Infection, Gallbladder InflammationArmsMicrobiological and histopathological investigation of bile and gallbladder wall specimens.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Expanded analysis for patients with acute cholecystitis indicates outcomes vary based on COVID-19 status and treatment modality.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impact of Hospital Level of Care on the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: a Population-Based Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. An investigation into the predictive role of serum inflammatory parameters in the diagnosis of complicated acute cholecystitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Regional variations in the treatment of gallstone disease may affect patient outcome: a large, population-based register study in sweden.Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie HalpinLegacy Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, OR, US.
Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOf people admitted to hospital for biliary tract disease, 20% have acute cholecystitis. Up to the age of 50 years, acute calculous cholecystitis is three times more common in women than in men, and about one and a half times more common in women than in men thereafter. About 95% of people with acute cholecystitis have gallstones. Optimal therapy for acute cholecystitis, based on timing and severity of presentation, remains controversial. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for acute cholecystitis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to October 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

resultsWe found 18 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

conclusionsIn this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: early cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, observation alone, open cholecystectomy, and percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyCholecystitis, AcuteGallstonesHumans

Identifiers

PMID25144428
PMCPMC4140413
OpenAlexW4301035627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.