Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144269›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2014

A robust chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol for studying transcription factor-DNA interactions and histone modifications in wood-forming tissue.

Wei Li, Ying-Chung Lin, Quanzi Li, Rui Shi, Chien-Yuan Lin, Hao Chen, Ling Chuang, Guan-Zheng Qu, Ronald R Sederoff, Vincent L Chiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comprehensive Analysis of the Catalase (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of PsnWRKY70 in Regulatory Network Response to Infection withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Cys2His2 Zinc Finger Transcription FactorFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wei Li1] State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. [2] Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Ying-Chung Lin1] State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. [2] Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Quanzi Li1] State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. [2] Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. [3] College of Forestry, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, China.
Rui ShiForest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Chien-Yuan LinForest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Hao ChenForest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Ling ChuangForest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Guan-Zheng QuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Ronald R SederoffForest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Vincent L Chiang1] State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China. [2] Forest Biotechnology Group, Department of Forestry &Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. [3] Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Woody cells and tissues are recalcitrant to standard chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) procedures. However, we recently successfully implemented ChIP in wood-forming tissue of the model woody plant Populus trichocarpa. Here we provide the detailed ChIP protocol optimized for wood-forming tissue that we used in those studies. By using stem-differentiating xylem (SDX; a wood-forming tissue), we identified all steps that were ineffective in standard ChIP protocols and systematically modified them to develop and optimize a robust ChIP protocol. The protocol includes tissue collection, cross-linking, nuclear isolation, chromatin extraction, DNA fragmentation, immunoprecipitation, DNA purification and sequence analysis. The protocol takes 2.5 d to complete and allows a robust 8-10-fold enrichment of transcription factor (TF)-bound genomic fragments (~150 ng/g of SDX) over nonspecific DNAs. The enriched DNAs are of high quality and can be used for subsequent PCR and DNA-seq analyses. We used this protocol to identify genome-wide specific TF-DNA interactions during wood formation and histone modifications associated with regulation of wood formation. Our protocol, which may be suitable for many tissue types, is so far the only working ChIP system for wood-forming tissue.

Indexed as

Base SequenceChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNADNA FragmentationHistonesImmunoprecipitationMolecular Sequence DataPopulusSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsWoodXylemDNAHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25144269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.