Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144251›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Vestibular perception and the vestibulo-ocular reflex in young and older adults.

Nai-Yuan Nicholas Chang, Meghan M Hiss, Mark C Sanders, Osarenoma U Olomu, Paul R MacNeilage, Rosalie M Uchanski, Timothy E Hullar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Aging of the Human Vestibular System.Seminars in hearing · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nai-Yuan Nicholas Chang1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; and 2Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Meghan M Hiss
Mark C Sanders
Osarenoma U Olomu
Paul R MacNeilage
Rosalie M Uchanski
Timothy E Hullar
Washington University in St. Louis · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Function of Vestibular-Nerve Afferent TypesK08DC006869 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HULLAR, TIMOTHY E · 2004 to 2008
$888k
RESEARCH TRAINING FOR CLINICAL AUDIOLOGISTST35DC008765 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, WILLIAM WALTER · 2008 to 2018
$369k
NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC006869NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesQuantification of the perceptual thresholds to vestibular stimuli may offer valuable complementary information to that provided by measures of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Perceptual thresholds could be particularly important in evaluating some subjects, such as the elderly, who might have a greater potential of central as well as peripheral vestibular dysfunction. The authors hypothesized that perceptual detection and discrimination thresholds would worsen with aging, and that there would be a poor relation between thresholds and traditional measures of the angular VOR represented by gain and phase on rotational chair testing.

designThe authors compared the detection and discrimination thresholds of 19 younger and 16 older adults in response to earth-vertical, 0.5 Hz rotations. Perceptual results of the older subjects were then compared with the gain and phase of their VOR in response to earth-vertical rotations over the frequency range from 0.025 to 0.5 Hz.

resultsDetection thresholds were found to be 0.69 ± 0.29 degree/sec (mean ± standard deviation) for the younger participants and 0.81 ± 0.42 degree/sec for older participants. Discrimination thresholds in younger and older adults were 4.83 ± 1.80 degree/sec and 4.33 ± 1.57 degree/sec, respectively. There was no difference in either measure between age groups. Perceptual thresholds were independent of the gain and phase of the VOR.

conclusionsThese results indicate that there is no inevitable loss of vestibular perception with aging. Elevated thresholds among the elderly are therefore suggestive of pathology rather than normal consequences of aging. Furthermore, perceptual thresholds offer additional insight, beyond that supplied by the VOR alone, into vestibular function.

Indexed as

RotationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDifferential ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSensory ThresholdsVestibular DiseasesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25144251
PMCPMC4172585
OpenAlexW2329705161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.