ReviewChest2014
Introduction and executive summary: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.
Review in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines.Intensive care medicine · 2020Guideline
- Variation in Ventilator Allocation Guidelines by US State During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- The Association Between Hospital Capacity Strain and Inpatient Outcomes in Highly Developed Countries: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Telementoring During Resource-Limited Patient Care Simulation Improves Caregiver Performance and Patient Survival.Critical care explorations · 2024Trial
- [Visceral surgery in mass casualty incidents due to disasters, crises and war].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Preparedness for blackouts in Iberian Peninsula patients using home respiratory therapies.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Neonatal and Pediatric Transport: A Contemporary Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Gloving the Surgeon:Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Review
- Adjustment of medical standards in disaster, crises and war: a scoping review of the literature.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Pediatric capacity crisis: A framework and strategies to prepare for a pediatric surge.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- The influence of explainable vs non-explainable clinical decision support systems on rapid triage decisions: a mixed methods study.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Value of information analysis for pandemic response: intensive care unit preparedness at the onset of COVID-19.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Clinician Ethical Perspectives on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Practice.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2022Article
- Perspectives of Triage Team Members Participating in Statewide Triage Simulations for Scarce Resource Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Washington State.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Ethics of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation under Conventional and Crisis Standards of Care.The Journal of clinical ethics · 2022Article
- Article
- Provision of critical care in austere conditions: staff, supplies and space.Intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19: Updated 2021 Guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Natural disasters, industrial accidents, terrorism attacks, and pandemics all have the capacity to result in large numbers of critically ill or injured patients. This supplement provides suggestions for all of those involved in a disaster or pandemic with multiple critically ill patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, professional societies, and public health or government officials. The current Task Force included a total of 100 participants from nine countries, comprised of clinicians and experts from a wide variety of disciplines. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted to identify studies upon which evidence-based recommendations could be made. No studies of sufficient quality were identified. Therefore, the panel developed expert-opinion-based suggestions that are presented in this supplement using a modified Delphi process. The ultimate aim of the supplement is to expand the focus beyond the walls of ICUs to provide recommendations for the management of all critically ill or injured adults and children resulting from a pandemic or disaster wherever that care may be provided. Considerations for the management of critically ill patients include clinical priorities and logistics (supplies, evacuation, and triage) as well as the key enablers (systems planning, business continuity, legal framework, and ethical considerations) that facilitate the provision of this care. The supplement also aims to illustrate how the concepts of mass critical care are integrated across the spectrum of surge events from conventional through contingency to crisis standards of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.