Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25144126›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American College of Nutrition2014

Total fructose intake and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts.

Viranda H Jayalath, John L Sievenpiper, Russell J de Souza, Vanessa Ha, Arash Mirrahimi, Ingrid D Santaren, Sonia Blanco Mejia, Marco Di Buono, Alexandra L Jenkins, Lawrence A Leiter and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01608620 unknown statusnot on this map

The Relation of Total and Individual Fructose-containing Sugars With Incident Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Series of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Prospective Observational Studies

TypeobservationalSponsorJohn SievenpiperRan2012 to 2016Enrolled1ConditionsOverweight, Obesity, Dyslipidemia, Hyperlipidemia
NCT02702375 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Relation of Important Food Sources of Sugars With Incident Cardiometabolic Disease: A Series of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses to Inform Guidelines, Public Health Policy, and Future Research Design

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Metabolic Syndrome X, Hypertension, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsFructose-containing Sugars
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Fructose Consumption-Free Sugars and Their Health Effects.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Viranda H Jayalatha Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit , Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center , Toronto , Ontario , CANADA.
John L Sievenpiper
Russell J de Souza
Vanessa Ha
Arash Mirrahimi
Ingrid D Santaren
Sonia Blanco Mejia
Marco Di Buono
Alexandra L Jenkins
Lawrence A Leiter
Thomas M S Wolever
Joseph Beyene
Cyril W C Kendall
David J A Jenkins
University of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAHeart and Stroke Foundation · CAMcMaster University · CAOntario Clinical Oncology Group · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough most controlled feeding trials have failed to show an adverse effect of fructose on blood pressure, concerns continue to be raised regarding the role of fructose in hypertension. To quantify the association between fructose-containing sugar (high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and fructose) intake and incident hypertension, a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies was undertaken.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library (through February 5, 2014) were searched for relevant studies. Two independent reviewers reviewed and extracted relevant data. Risk estimates were aggregated comparing the lowest (reference) quintile with highest quintile of intake using inverse variance random effect models and expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I(2) statistic). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01608620.

resultsEligibility criteria were met by 3 prospective cohorts (n = 37,375 men and 185,855 women) with 58,162 cases of hypertension observed over 2,502,357 person-years of follow-up. Median fructose intake was 5.7-6.0% total energy in the lowest quintile and 13.9-14.3% total energy in the highest quintile. Fructose intake was not associated with incident hypertension (RR = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.99-1.04), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%, p = 0.59). Spline curve modeling showed a U-shaped relationship with a negative association at intakes ≤50th percentile (∼10% total energy) and a positive association at higher intakes.

conclusionsTotal fructose intake was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension in 3 large prospective cohorts of U.S. men and women.

Indexed as

Blood PressureDatabases, FactualFructoseHumansHypertensionObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsFructosefructosehypertensionmeta-analysisprospective cohortsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25144126
PMCPMC4261182
OpenAlexW1966376927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.