ArticleBioMed research international2014
Physicochemical characteristics of bone substitutes used in oral surgery in comparison to autogenous bone.
Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival Rates of Dental Implants in Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Blocks: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Osteogenic Potential of Autologous Dentin Graft Compared with Bovine Xenograft Mixed with Autologous Bone in the Esthetic Zone: Radiographic, Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Trial
- Critical-sized marginal defects around implants treated with xenografts in rabbits.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of particulate bovine bone substitutes for oral regeneration: a narrative review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Review
- Autologous Tooth Granulometry and Specific Surface Area with Three Grinding Methods: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Complications Following Staged Alveolar Ridge Augmentation and Dental Implantation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 151 Cases with Allogeneic and 70 Cases with Autogenous Bone Blocks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A New Anorganic Equine Bone Substitute for Oral Surgery: Structural Characterization and Regenerative Potential.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- CSBD Healing in Rats after Application of Bovine Xenogeneic Biomaterial Enriched with Magnesium Alloy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Development and physicochemical characterization of novel porous phosphate glass bone graft substitute and in vitro comparison with xenograft.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Three-Dimensional Bone Substitutes for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Biological and Structural Characterization.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2018Article
- Characterization and antimicrobial efficacy of Portland cement impregnated with silver nanoparticles.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2017Article
- Sinus Lift Augmentation by Using Calcium Sulphate. A Retrospective 12 Months Radiographic Evaluation Over 25 Treated Italian Patients.The open dentistry journal · 2015Article
- Histological evaluation of two different anorganic bovine bone matrixes in lateral wall sinus elevation procedure: A retrospective study.National journal of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
- Physicochemical Characterization of Five Different Bone Graft Substitutes Used in Periodontal Regeneration: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone substitutes used in oral surgery include allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials that are frequently used to compensate bone loss or to reinforce repaired bone, but little is currently known about their physicochemical characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a number of physical and chemical properties in a variety of granulated mineral-based biomaterials used in dentistry and to compare them with those of autogenous bone. Autogenous bone and eight commercial biomaterials of human, bovine, and synthetic origins were studied by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, and laser diffraction to determine their chemical composition, calcium release concentration, crystallinity, and granulation size. The highest calcium release concentration was 24. 94 mg/g for Puros and the lowest one was 2.83 mg/g for Ingenios β-TCP compared to 20.15 mg/g for natural bone. The range of particles sizes, in terms of median size D50, varied between 1.32 μm for BioOss and 902.41 μm for OsteoSponge, compared to 282.1 μm for natural bone. All samples displayed a similar hexagonal shape as bone, except Ingenios β-TCP, Macrobone, and OsteoSponge, which showed rhomboid and triclinic shapes, respectively. Commercial bone substitutes significantly differ in terms of calcium concentration, particle size, and crystallinity, which may affect their in vivo performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.