Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143785›Full record

ArticleColorectal cancer2014

Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening.

Michael D Wirth, Heather M Brandt, Heather Dolinger, James W Hardin, Patricia A Sharpe, Jan M Eberth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adherence to Multiple Cancer Screening Tests among Women Living in Appalachia Ohio.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  14. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and resection of rectum performed together: first experience.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D WirthCancer Prevention & Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Heather M BrandtCancer Prevention & Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA ; Department of Health Promotion, Education, & Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200 Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Heather DolingerDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, & Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200 Columbia, SC 29208, USA ; American Cancer Society, Inc., 128 Stonemark Lane, Columbia, SC, USA.
James W HardinDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Patricia A SharpePrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street Room 124, Columbia, SC 29208, USA ; Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street Room 124, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Jan M EberthCancer Prevention & Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA ; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
University of South Carolina · USHealth Promotion Services · US

Funding

TISSUE BIOREPOSITORYP20RR017698 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FAYAD, RAJA · 2002 to 2011
$22.5M
HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTERS: CENTER PROPOSAL CAT. 1U48DP001936 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
TISSUE BIOREPOSITORY COREP30GM103336 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BERGER, FRANKLIN G. · 2013 to 2017
$5.4M
Training ProgramU54CA153461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001936NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153461NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017698NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare participation in breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. MATERIALS &

methodsThis random digit-dialed survey includes participants (aged 50-75 years) from South Carolina (USA). Past participation information in fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap test, prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination was obtained.Adjusted odds ratios are reported.

resultsAmong European-American women, any cervical or breast cancer screening was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Among African-American women, mammography was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests were associated with adherence to any CRC screening test among all men.

conclusionFuture research should explore approaches inclusive of cancer screening recommendations for multiple cancer types for reduction of cancer screening disparities.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningcervical cancer screeningcolorectal cancer screeninghealth disparitiesprostate cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID25143785
PMCPMC4134878
OpenAlexW2135495069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.