ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2014
Outcomes analysis of an alternative formulation of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma during the drug shortage era.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Cancer-Targeted Nanotherapies with Tumor Homing Peptides.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Recent Advances and Clinical Approach to Cancer Treatment with Nanotechnology Derived Biomolecule.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Nano-enabled strategies for targeted immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Micro and nanotechnologies: The little formulations that could.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Will nanomedicine become a good solution for the cardiotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Regulatory assessment of nano-enabled health products in public health interest. Position of the scientific advisory board of the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Advances in Polymeric Colloids for Cancer Treatment.Polymers · 2022Review
- Retrospective cohort analysis of prescription patterns of cancer medications during periods of drug stockouts in Botswana.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Microfluidic formulation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications.Biomaterials · 2021Review
- Facial Solid-Phase Synthesis of Well-Defined Zwitterionic Amphiphiles for Enhanced Anticancer Drug Delivery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Essential Medicines and Personal Protective Equipment Availability and Prices in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Global drug shortages due to COVID-19: Impact on patient care and mitigation strategies.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Article
- Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy - A Mini-Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Drug Shortage Impacts Patient Receipt of Induction Treatment.Health services research · 2018Article
- A tale of the two PEGylated liposomal doxorubicins.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn response to the critical shortage of Doxil(®), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed temporary importation of non-FDA-approved second-generation liposomal doxorubicin, Lipo-Dox(®). Lipo-Dox utilizes a different liposomal particle than Doxil and demonstrates different pharmacokinetic properties. Its use has never been evaluated in a North American population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Lipo-Dox at Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated during the Doxil shortage.
methodsPatients treated with Lipo-Dox from January 2012 to December 2012 were identified retrospectively. Disease response was defined radiographically by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) or biochemically by CA-125 level if measurable disease was not present. Survival was defined from the start date of Lipo-Dox until the date of progression or death. Toxicity was assessed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group common toxicity criteria.
resultsEighteen patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received Lipo-Dox were identified. These patients had a median of three prior treatment regimens. The median number of Lipo-Dox cycles given was 3.5 (range 1-8). No patients had a complete or partial response. Two patients had stable disease over a mean follow-up of 144.5 days. Fourteen patients had progressive disease, with a median time to progression of 82 days. Progression was based on CA-125 in four patients and RECIST in the remainder. Nine patients died from the disease.
conclusionAlthough this represents a small, pretreated population, there were no clinical responses to Lipo-Dox, raising the question as to whether it is an equivalent substitute for Doxil. Further evaluation is needed, but if confirmed, these findings raise concerns regarding the use of current stocks of Lipo-Dox, as well as the prudence of managing future drug shortages with pharmacologically similar, but clinically untested drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.