Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143615›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Spatial irregularities of sensitivity along the organ of Corti of the cochlea.

Andrei N Temchin, Mario A Ruggero

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sources of Microstructure in Mammalian Cochlear Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrei N TemchinKnowles Hearing Center, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3550.
Mario A RuggeroKnowles Hearing Center, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3550 mruggero@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-3644
Northwestern University · US

Funding

PERIPHERAL MECHANISMS OF HEARINGR01DC000419 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI RUGGERO, MARIO A · 1989 to 2014
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000419NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC000419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine structures of spatial profiles were computed from existing records of cat and chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers on the basis of their characteristic frequencies and cochlear maps. The spatial fine structures of characteristic-frequency thresholds and of "spontaneous" and driven firing rates were mutually correlated, implying the presence of sensitivity fluctuations due to spatial irregularities of presynaptic structures or processes of the inner hair cells and their input. These findings suggest that activity that appears spontaneous is not actually spontaneous and may indicate irregularities of tonotopic mapping in cochlear mechanics.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionCatsChinchillaCochlear NerveFemaleMaleOrgan of CortiSensory Receptor CellsSpace PerceptionStatistics as Topicauditory-nerve fiberscochleainner hair cellsorgan of Cortispatial irregularities

Identifiers

PMID25143615
PMCPMC4138343
OpenAlexW2037358799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.