Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143606›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Distinct roles of bulbar muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in olfactory discrimination learning.

Sasha Devore, Licurgo de Almeida, Christiane Linster

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noradrenergic Activity in the Olfactory Bulb Is a Key Element for the Stability of Olfactory Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Main Plant Extracts' Active Properties Effective on Scopolamine-Induced Memory Loss.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sasha DevoreDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850.
Licurgo de AlmeidaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-6587
Christiane LinsterDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 cl243@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

CRCNS: Cholinergic regulation of sensory computationR01DC009948 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
Neuromodulatory regulation of early olfactory processingF32DC011974 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DEVORE, SASHA · 2011 to 2013
$161k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC011974NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olfactory bulb (OB) and piriform cortex receive dense cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain. Cholinergic modulation within the piriform cortex has long been proposed to serve important functions in olfactory learning and memory. We here investigate how olfactory discrimination learning is regulated by cholinergic modulation of the OB inputs to the piriform cortex. We examined rats' performance on a two-alternative choice odor discrimination task following local, bilateral blockade of cholinergic nicotinic and/or muscarinic receptors in the OB. Results demonstrate that acquisition, but not recall, of novel discrimination problems is impaired following blockade of OB cholinergic receptors, although the relative contribution of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors depends on task difficulty. Blocking muscarinic receptors impairs learning for nearly all odor sets, whereas blocking nicotinic receptors only affects performance for perceptually similar odors. This pattern of behavioral effects is consistent with predictions from a model of cholinergic modulation in the OB and piriform cortex (de Almeida et al., 2013). Model simulations suggest that muscarinic and nicotinic receptors may serve complementary roles in regulating coherence and sparseness of the OB network output, which in turn differentially regulate the strength and overlap in cortical odor representations. Overall, our results suggest that muscarinic receptor blockade results in a bona fide learning impairment that may arise because cortical neurons are activated less often. Behavioral impairment following nicotinic receptor blockade may not be due to the inability of the cortex to learn, but rather arises because the cortex is unable to resolve highly overlapping input patterns.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholinergic AgentsComputer SimulationConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleModels, BiologicalOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysPiriform CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, NicotinicCholinergic AgentsReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, Nicotinicacetylcholinecholinergic neuromodulationolfactory bulbolfactory cortexrodent behavior

Identifiers

PMID25143606
PMCPMC4138336
OpenAlexW1995880874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.