Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143582›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Single-molecule long-read 16S sequencing to characterize the lung microbiome from mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia.

Ian Toma, Marc O Siegel, John Keiser, Anna Yakovleva, Alvin Kim, Lionel Davenport, Joseph Devaney, Eric P Hoffman, Rami Alsubail, Keith A Crandall and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Lung Microbiome: A New Frontier for Lung and Brain Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian TomaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA Department of Physical Therapy and Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA itoma@gwu.edu msiegel@mfa.gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-5899
Marc O SiegelDivision of Infectious Diseases, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA itoma@gwu.edu msiegel@mfa.gwu.edu.
John KeiserDepartment of Pathology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Anna YakovlevaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Alvin KimDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Lionel DavenportChildren's National Medical Research Center, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Joseph DevaneyChildren's National Medical Research Center, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Eric P HoffmanChildren's National Medical Research Center, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Rami AlsubailDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Keith A CrandallComputational Biology Institute, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Eduardo Castro-NallarComputational Biology Institute, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Marcos Pérez-LosadaComputational Biology Institute, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos (CIBIO), Vairão, Portugal.
Sarah K HiltonComputational Biology Institute, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Lakhmir S ChawlaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Timothy A McCaffreyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Gary L SimonDivision of Infectious Diseases, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalUL1TR000075 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$13.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031988 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$8.2M
K12 Career Development Program: Omics of Pediatric Lung Diseases in DCK12HL119994 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FREISHTAT, ROBERT J · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000075NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000075NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031988NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031988NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL119994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critically ill patients, the development of pneumonia results in significant morbidity and mortality and additional health care costs. The accurate and rapid identification of the microbial pathogens in patients with pulmonary infections might lead to targeted antimicrobial therapy with potentially fewer adverse effects and lower costs. Major advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) allow culture-independent identification of pathogens. The present study used NGS of essentially full-length PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA from the bronchial aspirates of intubated patients with suspected pneumonia. The results from 61 patients demonstrated that sufficient DNA was obtained from 72% of samples, 44% of which (27 samples) yielded PCR amplimers suitable for NGS. Out of the 27 sequenced samples, only 20 had bacterial culture growth, while the microbiological and NGS identification of bacteria coincided in 17 (85%) of these samples. Despite the lack of bacterial growth in 7 samples that yielded amplimers and were sequenced, the NGS identified a number of bacterial species in these samples. Overall, a significant diversity of bacterial species was identified from the same genus as the predominant cultured pathogens. The numbers of NGS-identifiable bacterial genera were consistently higher than identified by standard microbiological methods. As technical advances reduce the processing and sequencing times, NGS-based methods will ultimately be able to provide clinicians with rapid, precise, culture-independent identification of bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens and their antimicrobial sensitivity profiles.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAgedBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25143582
PMCPMC4313225
OpenAlexW1990867009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.