Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143579›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Limited utility of dried-blood- and plasma spot-based screening for antiretroviral treatment failure with Cobas Ampliprep/TaqMan HIV-1 version 2.0.

Souleymane Sawadogo, Andreas Shiningavamwe, Joy Chang, Andrew D Maher, Guoqing Zhang, Chunfu Yang, Esegiel Gaeb, Harold Kaura, Dennis Ellenberger, David W Lowrance

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Souleymane SawadogoDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia ssawadogo@cdc.gov.
Andreas ShiningavamweNamibia Institute of Pathology, Windhoek, Namibia.
Joy ChangDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew D MaherDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Guoqing ZhangDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chunfu YangDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Esegiel GaebNamibia Institute of Pathology, Windhoek, Namibia.
Harold KauraNamibia Institute of Pathology, Windhoek, Namibia.
Dennis EllenbergerDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
David W LowranceDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Windhoek, Namibia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNamibia Institute of Pathology · NA

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2013 WHO antiretroviral therapy (ART) guidelines recommend dried blood spots (DBS) as an alternative specimen type for viral load (VL) monitoring. We assessed the programmatic utility of screening for antiretroviral (ARV) treatment failure (TF) at 5,000 and 1,000 copies/ml using DBS and dried plasma spots (DPS) with a commonly used VL assay, the Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan V.2.0 (CAP/CTM). Plasma, DBS, and DPS were prepared from 839 whole-blood specimens collected from patients on ART for ≥ 6 months at three public facilities in Namibia. Using the CAP/CTM test, VL were measured in plasma, DBS, and DPS, and the results were compared using the plasma VL as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivities, specificities, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of DBS at ARV TF diagnostic thresholds of 5,000 copies/ml and 1,000 copies/ml were 0.99, 0.55, 0.33, and 0.99 and 0.99, 0.26, 0.29, and 0.99, respectively, and for DPS at TF diagnostic thresholds of 5,000 copies/ml and 1,000 copies/ml, they were 0.88, 0.98, 0.92, and 0.97 and 0.91, 0.96, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively. The prevalences of TF were overestimated in DBS by 33% and 57% at these two thresholds, respectively. A high rate of false-positive results would occur if the CAP/CTM with DBS were to be used to screen for ARV TF. WHO recommendations for DBS-based VL monitoring should be specific to the VL assay version and type. Despite the better performance of DPS, the programmatic utility for TF screening may be limited by requirements for processing the whole blood at the collection site.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Retroviral AgentsBloodDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNamibiaSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID25143579
PMCPMC4313218
OpenAlexW2062833694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.