ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014
Precision of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and effect of subculture and storage.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination of 7-hydroxyflavone and colistin: antibacterial activity and mechanism against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial proteins from oyster hemolymph improve the efficacy of conventional antibiotics.PloS one · 2025Article
- Contemporary Considerations for Establishing Reference Methods for Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam ETEST for the Detection of OXA-1 Resistance Mechanism among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Different Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods to Determine Vancomycin Susceptibility and MIC forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Variability of Beta-Lactam Broth Microdilution for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Point-Counterpoint: Should Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Vancomycin MICs?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Within-host bacterial growth dynamics with both mutation and horizontal gene transfer.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of telavancin susceptibility in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Vancomycin MICs and risk of complicated bacteremia by glycopeptide-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Reporting elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: consensus by an International Working Group.Future microbiology · 2019Article
- The Continued Value of Disk Diffusion for Assessing Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Clinical Laboratories: Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018Review
- CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018Review
- Reproducible measurement of vancomycin MICs within the susceptible range in Staphylococcus aureus by a broth microdilution method with a "quasi-continuum" gradient of antibiotic concentrations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017Article
- Antimicrobial Hydroxyapatite-Gelatin-Silica Composite Pastes with Tunable Setting Properties.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2017Article
- Analysis of MIC and Disk Diffusion Testing Variables for Gepotidacin and Comparator Agents against Select Bacterial Pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Identification of Low-Level Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in the Era of Informatics.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reproducibility of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs, measured by broth microdilution (BMD) and Etest, was prospectively assessed for 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from the blood samples from patients on vancomycin therapy. The isolates were tested at the time of isolation from blood and following 5, 10, and 20 subcultures and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of storage at -70 °C. The MICs were determined by Etest and BMD using two different manufacturers (BBL and Difco) of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB), and using three different drug powders: vancomycin from Sigma, vancomycin from Novation, and daptomycin from Cubist. The antimicrobial concentrations tested were 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 μg/ml. Two isolates were vancomycin intermediate and daptomycin nonsusceptible, and two isolates had reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (BMD MIC, 1.5 or 2.0 μg/ml). The vancomycin MICs were significantly higher in the BBL CA-MHB than those in the Difco CA-MHB, and with Sigma versus Novation vancomycin powder. The daptomycin MICs were also significantly higher in the BBL CA-MHB. The Etest MICs were significantly higher than those obtained by BMD for vancomycin but not for daptomycin. The average precision of the vancomycin BMD MICs when analyzing 20 results was ± 1.10-fold log2 dilutions, and it was ± 1.67-fold for daptomycin (10 results). The average precision for Etest was ± 1.11-fold for vancomycin and ± 1.16-fold for daptomycin. No significant change in MICs was noted following 5, 10, or 20 subcultures or at up to 6 months of frozen storage. However, the vancomycin MICs alone were significantly lower (0.74-fold) following 12 months of frozen storage. From these data, despite variations in CA-MHB and antimicrobial powder, the MIC result precision was <0.5 log2 dilutions in a single laboratory, suggesting that testing interdilution MICs (e.g., MICs between serial 2-fold dilutions) is a possibility. A more accurate method for measuring vancomycin MIC results is thus possible, but further standardization of BMD testing would be required to achieve this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.