Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143400›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2014

The actin regulators Enabled and Diaphanous direct distinct protrusive behaviors in different tissues during Drosophila development.

Stephanie H Nowotarski, Natalie McKeon, Rachel J Moser, Mark Peifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ovarian germline stem cell dedifferentiation is cytoneme dependent.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. TheMolecular biology of the cell · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie H NowotarskiDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Natalie McKeonDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Rachel J MoserDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Mark PeiferDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 peifer@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cell adhesion, signal transduction and cytoskeletal regulation in DrosophilaR01GM047857 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PEIFER, MARK A. · 1992 to 2016
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047857NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM47857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actin-based protrusions are important for signaling and migration during development and homeostasis. Defining how different tissues in vivo craft diverse protrusive behaviors using the same genomic toolkit of actin regulators is a current challenge. The actin elongation factors Diaphanous and Enabled both promote barbed-end actin polymerization and can stimulate filopodia in cultured cells. However, redundancy in mammals and Diaphanous' role in cytokinesis limited analysis of whether and how they regulate protrusions during development. We used two tissues driving Drosophila dorsal closure--migratory leading-edge (LE) and nonmigratory amnioserosal (AS) cells--as models to define how cells shape distinct protrusions during morphogenesis. We found that nonmigratory AS cells produce filopodia that are morphologically and dynamically distinct from those of LE cells. We hypothesized that differing Enabled and/or Diaphanous activity drives these differences. Combining gain- and loss-of-function with quantitative approaches revealed that Diaphanous and Enabled each regulate filopodial behavior in vivo and defined a quantitative "fingerprint"--the protrusive profile--which our data suggest is characteristic of each actin regulator. Our data suggest that LE protrusiveness is primarily Enabled driven, whereas Diaphanous plays the primary role in the AS, and reveal each has roles in dorsal closure, but its robustness ensures timely completion in their absence.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisActinsAnimalsCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsForminsPseudopodiaActinsCarrier Proteinsdiaphanous protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsENA-VASP proteinsFormins

Identifiers

PMID25143400
PMCPMC4196866
OpenAlexW2152649886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.