Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25143071›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

⁸⁹Zr-huJ591 immuno-PET imaging in patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer.

Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Joseph A O'Donoghue, Volkan Beylergil, Serge Lyashchenko, Shutian Ruan, Stephen B Solomon, Jeremy C Durack, Jorge A Carrasquillo, Robert A Lefkowitz, Mithat Gonen and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging with [The Lancet. Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  4. Copper-64 trastuzumab PET imaging: a reproducibility study.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2019
    Trial
  5. First-in-Human Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Imaging UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  6. Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Radiation Dosimetry forJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A phase I study to evaluate the dosimetry and safety of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Looking backward to move forward: a chemist's perspective on the future of radiopharmaceuticals.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. First-in-Human Evaluation of Site-Specifically LabeledJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Neeta Pandit-TaskarDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, pandit-n@mskcc.org.
Joseph A O'Donoghue
Volkan Beylergil
Serge Lyashchenko
Shutian Ruan
Stephen B Solomon
Jeremy C Durack
Jorge A Carrasquillo
Robert A Lefkowitz
Mithat Gonen
Jason S Lewis
Jason P Holland
Sarah M Cheal
Victor E Reuter
Joseph R Osborne
Massimo F Loda
Peter M Smith-Jones
Wolfgang A Weber
Neil H Bander
Howard I Scher
Michael J Morris
Steven M Larson
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USBroad Institute · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Changes in MetabolismP50CA086438 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI RIVIERI, ISABELLE · 2000 to 2015
$29.9M
Immuno-PET With Anti-PSMA 89Zr-J591 mAb For Molecular Imaging of Prostate CancerR21CA153177 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI OSBORNE, JOSEPH REGINALD · 2011 to 2012
$404k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA086438NCI NIH HHS R21 CA153177NCI NIH HHS R21 CA153177-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven the bone tropism of prostate cancer, conventional imaging modalities poorly identify or quantify metastatic disease. (89)Zr-huJ591 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was performed in patients with metastatic prostate cancer to analyze and validate this as an imaging biomarker for metastatic disease. The purpose of this initial study was to assess safety, biodistribution, normal organ dosimetry, and optimal imaging time post-injection for lesion detection.

methodsTen patients with metastatic prostate cancer received 5 mCi of (89)Zr-huJ591. Four whole-body scans with multiple whole-body count rate measurements and serum activity concentration measurements were obtained in all patients. Biodistribution, clearance, and lesion uptake by (89)Zr-huJ591 immuno-PET imaging was analyzed and dosimetry was estimated using MIRD techniques. Initial assessment of lesion targeting of (89)Zr-huJ591 was done. Optimal time for imaging post-injection was determined.

resultsThe dose was well tolerated with mild chills and rigors seen in two patients. The clearance of (89)Zr-huJ591 from serum was bi-exponential with biological half-lives of 7 ± 4.5 h (range 1.1-14 h) and 62 ± 13 h (range 51-89 h) for initial rapid and later slow phase. Whole-body biological clearance was 219 ± 48 h (range 153-317 h). The mean whole-body and liver residence time was 78.7 and 25.6 h, respectively. Dosimetric estimates to critical organs included liver 7.7 ± 1.5 cGy/mCi, renal cortex 3.5 ± 0.4 cGy/mCi, and bone marrow 1.2 ± 0.2 cGy/mCi. Optimal time for patient imaging after injection was 7 ± 1 days. Lesion targeting of bone or soft tissue was seen in all patients. Biopsies were performed in 8 patients for a total 12 lesions, all of which were histologically confirmed as metastatic prostate cancer. One biopsy-proven lesion was not positive on (89)Zr-huJ591, while the remaining 11 lesions were (89)Zr-huJ591 positive. Two biopsy-positive nodal lesions were noted only on (89)Zr-huJ591 study, while the conventional imaging modality was negative.

conclusion(89)Zr-huJ591 PET imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is safe and shows good localization of disease in prostate cancer patients. Liver is the critical organ for dosimetry, and 7 ± 1 days is the optimal imaging time. A larger study is underway to determine lesion detection in an expanded cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalRadioisotopesZirconiumAgedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation DosageAntibodies, MonoclonalRadioisotopesZirconium

Identifiers

PMID25143071
PMCPMC4404641
OpenAlexW2057600943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.